Featured Product

    EIOPA Discussion Paper on Business Models Arising from Digitalization

    June 10, 2020

    EIOPA published a discussion paper on the insurance and reinsurance value chain and new business models arising from digitalization. EIOPA is aiming to get a better picture on possible fragmentation of the EU insurance value chain and supervisory challenges related to that. This paper is a first step in scrutinizing the situation to support supervisors in the challenges arising from the new business models and the possible fragmentation of the insurance value chain, as a result of new technologies, business models, and actors entering the insurance market. The discussion paper contains 21 questions to consider when responding to the request for feedback. EIOPA will assess the feedback to this discussion paper to better understand the phenomenon and plan useful next steps. Feedback on this discussion paper can be submitted, via the EU Survey Tool, by September 07, 2020.

    Complexity of how insurance is being manufactured and distributed is increasing, in addition to the growing involvement of third parties, with new forms of outsourcing. However, this can come with additional challenges in the form of legal and compliance issues as well as the creation of new conduct and prudential risks and amplification or relocation of significantly old risks such as operational risk, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) risks, security, governance, and reputational risks. The widespread use of third party providers can also lead to concentration risk if a large number of undertakings become dependent on a small number of dominant outsourced or third party service providers. Thus, a fragmentation of the insurance value chain could occur, including  a potential for a reduced regulatory and supervisory grip on the relevant activities in the value chain, or ways in which the lengthening of the value chain stresses existing regulatory and supervisory oversight.

    As a consequence, supervision requires more attention to different companies involved throughout the value chain that must be supervised, or at least identified and overseen efficiently and effectively. Supervisors are also challenged to improve their information gathering, knowledge, experience, skillset, and resources for controlling new models and technologies while keeping up with the rapid changes. The consultation also highlights that Solvency II regular reporting might not be fit-for-purpose to have an overview of cooperation with all third parties and there might be a need for more flexible reporting. Similarly, although Solvency II Directive provides rules for outsourcing, it might be worth exploring additional practices for proper supervision of more fragmented value chains. Effort is also needed to avoid diverging supervisory outcomes between national competent authorities, particularly considering that the insurtech developments can often have a cross-border and cross-sector impact. As per EIOPA, the possible areas for further work include the following:

    • More specific analysis of possible regulatory responses to third parties in the value chain. This could include exploring ways of getting better overview on market developments involving third parties active in the insurance value chain, including understanding ownership structures, partnership agreements, and new forms of outsourcing to assess who underwrites the risk and where risks are concentrated.
    • A follow-up study focusing on the impact of platforms and ecosystems and their practical supervision (licensing, outsourcing, consumer protection, product oversight, and governance rules), including the application of EU law and possible gaps.
    • Adapting disclosures and advice requirements to the digital world, based on an assessment of customer capabilities and new behavior patterns and ways of providing information and advice.
    • Further analyses of broader measures that might underpin sound digital markets in insurance and insurance related data.

    EIOPA is expecting, from interested parties, views on whether they agree with its view of the risks and benefits and whether they have any comments or additional proposals on proposed solutions or next steps. EIOPA will work further with the national competent authorities on supervisory responses to further support supervisors and supervisory convergence, while maintaining a strong and open dialog with the market and other stakeholders.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: September 07, 2020

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Reinsurance, Operational Risk, Governance, Cyber Risk, Concentration Risk, Insurtech, Cloud Computing, Solvency II, Reporting, EIOPA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    ECB Finds Banks Unprepared for Pillar 3 Climate Risk Disclosures

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of the 2022 supervisory assessment of climate-related and environmental risk disclosures among significant institutions (103) and a selected number of less significant institutions (28).

    April 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NCUA Assesses Credit Union Exposure to Climate-Related Physical Risks

    The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) released a Research Note that examines the exposure of credit unions to climate-related physical risks. In a related development

    April 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Multiple Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking comments, until July 31, 2023, on the draft Guidelines on the proposed common approach to the resubmission of historical data under the EBA reporting framework.

    April 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Adopts Regulation on Own Funds, Issues Other Updates

    The European Commission adopted Delegated Regulations on own funds and eligible liabilities, on requirements for the internal methodology under the internal default risk model

    April 20, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CDP Platform to Report Plastic-Related Impact, Issues Other Updates

    The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) announced that its global environmental disclosure platform has enabled reporting on plastic-related impact for nearly 7,000 companies worldwide

    April 19, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IASB to Enhance Reporting of Climate Risks, Proposes IFRS 9 Amendments

    The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) updated its work plan to enhance the reporting of climate-related risks in the financial statements,

    April 19, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Addresses Data Gaps and Macro-Prudential Policy for Climate Risks

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a brief paper that examines challenges associated with the use of macro-prudential policies to address climate-related financial risks.

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Sets Out Business Plan, Launches TechSprint on Greenwashing

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published its business plan for 2023-24. The plan sets out details of the work planned for the next 12 months to achieve better outcomes for consumers and markets

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    UK Committee Sets Out Recommendations for Next Phase of Open Banking

    The Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC), comprising the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) as co-chairs and the HM Treasury and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) as members

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Publishes Multiple Regulatory Updates for Banking Institutions

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of the 2022 climate risk stress test of the Eurosystem balance sheet,

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8873