Featured Product

    SAMA Publishes Financial Entities Ethical Red Teaming Framework

    June 07, 2019

    SAMA published the Financial Entities Ethical Red Teaming Framework, in an effort to address the increasing cyber risks. The framework is intended as a guide to prepare and execute controlled cyber attacks against the production environment, without exposing sensitive information, with the help of certified and experienced Red Teaming Providers. The framework aims to share intelligence and information obtained during testing to further improve cyber resilience in the financial sector in Saudi Arabia. The framework applies to all member organizations in the financial sector regulated by SAMA.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.

     

    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • The principal objective of the framework is to provide guidance on how to conduct the red teaming activities and how to test the detection and response capabilities of a member organization against real sophisticated and advanced attacks and enhance the knowledge of the involved stakeholders. The framework consists of four phases—preparation phase, scenario phase, execution phase, and lessons learned phase. Red Teaming should not be regarded as an audit but as a simulation test that seeks to provide insight into the level of resilience and effectiveness of the implemented cyber-security controls and relevant processes. Red Teaming is not a penetration test; rather, in contrast to a penetration test (in which one or more specific information assets are tested and assessed), it focuses on replicating a targeted and realistic attack against the entire member organization and is performed in a controlled manner. 

    SAMA has the authority to select any member organization to perform a red teaming exercise considering its criticality and the emerging threat landscape. In addition, a member organization can rightfully conduct red teaming exercise to ensure security resilience. However, as a minimum, domestic systemically important entities will be subject to testing once every three years, in line with this framework. SAMA will maintain the framework and conduct periodic reviews to determine its effectiveness, including the extent to which it addresses the emerging cyber-security threats and risks. If applicable, SAMA will update the framework based on the outcome of the review and lessons learned.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Saudi Arabia, Banking, Red Teaming Framework, Cyber Risk, Cyber Testing, Operational Risk, Cyber Resilience, SAMA

    Related Articles
    News

    ECB Finds Banks Unprepared for Pillar 3 Climate Risk Disclosures

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of the 2022 supervisory assessment of climate-related and environmental risk disclosures among significant institutions (103) and a selected number of less significant institutions (28).

    April 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NCUA Assesses Credit Union Exposure to Climate-Related Physical Risks

    The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) released a Research Note that examines the exposure of credit unions to climate-related physical risks. In a related development

    April 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Multiple Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking comments, until July 31, 2023, on the draft Guidelines on the proposed common approach to the resubmission of historical data under the EBA reporting framework.

    April 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Adopts Regulation on Own Funds, Issues Other Updates

    The European Commission adopted Delegated Regulations on own funds and eligible liabilities, on requirements for the internal methodology under the internal default risk model

    April 20, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CDP Platform to Report Plastic-Related Impact, Issues Other Updates

    The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) announced that its global environmental disclosure platform has enabled reporting on plastic-related impact for nearly 7,000 companies worldwide

    April 19, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IASB to Enhance Reporting of Climate Risks, Proposes IFRS 9 Amendments

    The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) updated its work plan to enhance the reporting of climate-related risks in the financial statements,

    April 19, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Addresses Data Gaps and Macro-Prudential Policy for Climate Risks

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a brief paper that examines challenges associated with the use of macro-prudential policies to address climate-related financial risks.

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Sets Out Business Plan, Launches TechSprint on Greenwashing

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published its business plan for 2023-24. The plan sets out details of the work planned for the next 12 months to achieve better outcomes for consumers and markets

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    UK Committee Sets Out Recommendations for Next Phase of Open Banking

    The Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC), comprising the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) as co-chairs and the HM Treasury and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) as members

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Publishes Multiple Regulatory Updates for Banking Institutions

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of the 2022 climate risk stress test of the Eurosystem balance sheet,

    April 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8873