Featured Product

    PRA Proposes Reporting and Rulebook Changes Under CRR and Solvency II

    June 07, 2019

    PRA published an occasional consultation paper (CP13/19) that proposes minor amendments to the PRA Rulebook Parts, supervisory statements, and bank and insurer reporting templates. The proposed changes fall under the Solvency II and Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). Among other changes, CP13/19 consults on corrections and clarifications to National Specific Templates (NSTs), internal model output templates, and associated LOG files, along with the discontinuation of the FSA006 return, which provides PRA with Value at Risk (VaR) back-testing data for banks. The consultation closes on August 07, 2019.

  • The information to be provided by a third party seeking authorization to assess the compliance of securitizations with the STS criteria provided for in Securitization Regulation should enable a competent authority to evaluate whether and, to what extent, the applicant meets the conditions of Article 28(1) of the Securitization Regulation. An authorized third party will be able to provide STS assessment services across EU. The application for authorization should, therefore, comprehensively identify that third party, any group to which this third party belongs, and the scope of its activities. With regard to the STS assessment services to be provided, the application should include the envisaged scope of the services to be provided as well as their geographical scope, particularly the following:

    • To facilitate effective use of the authorization resources of a competent authority, each application for authorization should include a table clearly identifying each submitted document and its relevance to the conditions that must be met for authorization.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the fees charged by the third party are non-discriminatory and are sufficient and appropriate to cover the costs for the provision of the STS assessment services, as required by Article 28(1)(a) of Securitization Regulation, the third party should provide comprehensive information on pricing policies, pricing criteria, fee structures, and fee schedules.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party is able to ensure the integrity and independence of the STS assessment process, that third party should provide information on the structure of those internal controls. Furthermore, the third party should provide comprehensive information on the composition of the management body and on the qualifications and repute of each of its members.
    • To enable the competent authority to assess whether the third party has sufficient operational safeguards and internal processes to assess STS compliance, the third party should provide information on its procedures relating to the required qualification of its staff. The third party should also demonstrate that its STS assessment methodology is sensitive to the type of securitization and that specifies separate procedures and safeguards for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) transactions/programs and non-ABCP securitizations.

    The use of outsourcing arrangements and a reliance on the use of external experts can raise concerns about the robustness of operational safeguards and internal processes. The application should, therefore, contain specific information about the nature and scope of any such outsourcing arrangements or use of external experts as well as the third party's governance over those arrangements. Regulation (EU) 2019/885 is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to EC.

     

    Related Links

    Effective Date: June 18, 2019

    Press Release
  • Proposed Rule 1
  • Proposed Rule 2
  • Proposed Rule 3
  • Presentation on Regulatory Framework (PDF)
  • Presentation on Resolution Plan Rules (PDF)
  • The proposals in CP13/19 are included in five chapters as follows:

    • In Chapter 2, PRA sets out proposals to update SS3/15 on the quality of capital instruments under Solvency II to reflect changes in the Solvency II regulations that were approved by European Parliament on April 16, 2019. The draft amendments to SS3/15 are set out in Appendix 1
    • In Chapter 3, PRA sets out proposals to delete extraneous and historical material from SS8/14 and SS2/15 to align with the current format and bring the supervisory statements up to date. SS8/14 provides information on subordinated guarantees and the quality of capital for insurers. SS2/15 covers the topic of own funds under Solvency II. The draft amendments to SS8/14 and SS2/15 have been set out in appendices 2 and 3, respectively.
    • Chapter 4 sets out proposals to discontinue the FSA006 return. FSA006 return provides PRA with VaR back-testing data. PRA proposes discontinuing FSA006 and updating the Regulatory Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook. PRA proposes deleting all references to FSA006 from SS34/15 on guidelines for completing regulatory reports. The draft instrument removing FSA006 from PRA rules and the draft amendments to SS34/15 have been set out in appendices 4 and 5, respectively. This chapter is relevant to the UK banks and UK designated investment firms with CRR Internal Model Approach permissions.
    • Chapter 5 sets out the PRA proposals to make minor updates, corrections, and clarifications to National Specific Templates (NSTs), NST LOG files, internal model output templates and LOG files, and related SS25/15 on regulatory reporting internal model outputs. PRA proposes to amend NSTs including NS.07 and NS.08 (template and LOG file); NS.10 and NS.11 (LOG file); and Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook. Internal model outputs to be amended include IM.00 and IM.03 (template and LOG file). The proposed changes have been set out in appendices 6-9. This chapter is relevant to all Solvency II firms, including the Society of Lloyd’s.

    During the consultation period, PRA will be issuing a Public Working Draft (PWD) of the taxonomy update to support collection of the proposed changes to NSTs, internal model output, market risk sensitivities and standard formula reporting. The PWD will include the interaction of these changes with the draft EIOPA Taxonomy 2.4 changes. PRA plans to give firms no less than three weeks to review the PWD. Pending consideration of the responses to the consultation, the proposed implementation date for Chapter 5 is November 30, 2019 whereas proposed implementation date for chapters 2-4 will be the publication date of the final policy.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: August 07, 2019

    Effective Date: November 30, 2019 (Chapter 5) and Publication Date of Final Policy (Chapter 2-4)

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Reporting, PRA rulebook, CP13/19, Solvency II, CRR, National Specific Templates, FSA006, Internal Model, PRA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness

    APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).

    December 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance

    The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).

    December 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.

    November 30, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules

    Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR

    EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability

    The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7751