OSFI Raises the Domestic Stability Buffer for Canadian D-SIBs
OSFI has decided to set the level of the Domestic Stability Buffer at 2.00% of total risk-weighted assets, as calculated under the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline. The buffer has been set at this level, with effect from October 31, 2019. The Domestic Stability Buffer applies only to the federally regulated financial institutions that have been designated as domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs).
In December 2018, the Domestic Stability Buffer had been set at 1.75%, with effect from April 30, 2019. As of June 2019, the federally regulated financial institutions that have been designated as D-SIBs are Bank of Montreal, Bank of Nova Scotia, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, National Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Canada, and Toronto-Dominion Bank. This increase in the buffer (to 2%) reflects the OSFI assessment that, on balance, the identified systemic vulnerabilities to D-SIBs in Canada remain elevated while economic conditions continue to be accommodative. The key vulnerabilities include Canadian household indebtedness, asset imbalances in the Canadian market, and Canadian institutional indebtedness. Household debt-to-income ratio has remained high since the last domestic stability buffer decision, housing market uncertainty remains elevated, and risks related to non-financial corporate debt have continued to grow. Against this backdrop, a favorable credit environment and stable economic conditions continue to provide a window of opportunity for D-SIBs to increase their capital holdings.
The Domestic Stability Buffer contributes to D-SIBs' resilience to key vulnerabilities and system-wide risks, thus contributing to financial stability. OSFI reviews and sets the level of the Domestic Stability Buffer on a semi-annual basis (June and December), based on its ongoing monitoring of federally regulated financial institutions as well as system-wide and sectoral developments. Decisions on the calibration of the buffer are based on the OSFI supervisory judgment, are informed by its monitoring and analytical work on a range of vulnerabilities, and are made in consultation with the federal financial regulatory partners of OSFI. OSFI applies a variety of qualitative analysis and quantitative tools to the determination of the buffer, including consideration of exposure trends, financial and macro economic indicators, stress testing and other supervisory information.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel III, Domestic Stability Buffer, D-SIBs, Capital Adequacy, Systemic Risk, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Pierre-Etienne Chabanel
Brings expertise in technology and software solutions around banking regulation, whether deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
OCC Extends Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Deadline to November 25, 2019Related Articles
EBA Provides Clarity on Implementation of Certain COVID-19 Policies
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
BCBS Report Examines Progress on Adoption of Basel III Framework
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
BCBS Amends Guidelines on Sound Management of AML/CFT Risks
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).
US Agencies Finalize Amendments to Swap Margin Rule
US Agencies (Farm Credit Administration, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) finalized changes to the swap margin rule to facilitate implementation of prudent risk management strategies at banks and other entities with significant swap activities.
PRA Letter Sets Expectations on Approach to Managing Climate Risks
PRA published a letter that builds on the expectations set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/19) on enhancing banks' and insurers' approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change.
EBA Guidelines on Treatment of Structural Foreign Exchange Under CRR
EBA finalized the guidelines on treatment of structural foreign-exchange (FX) positions under Article 352(2) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
FSB Issues Statement on Impact of COVID-19 Crisis on Benchmark Reform
FSB published a statement on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global benchmark transition.
IAIS Publishes List of Internationally Active Insurance Groups
IAIS published the list of Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs) publicly disclosed by group-wide supervisors.
FED Temporarily Revises FR Y-9C With Respect to PPPLF and CARES Act
FED has temporarily revised the reporting form on consolidated financial statements for holding companies (FR Y-9C; OMB No. 7100-0128).
EC Launches Consultation on Review of Solvency II Directive
EC launched a consultation on the review of the key elements of Solvency II Directive, with the comment period ending on October 21, 2020.
