While speaking at the FCA Conference on Governance in Banking in London, James Proudman of BoE highlighted that technology, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, is shaping a new economy powered by big data and advanced analytics. He also provided an overview of the scale of introduction of artificial intelligence in UK financial services, based on the preliminary results of a BoE and FCA survey, the results of which are expected to be published in the third quarter of 2019. Finally, he outlined three principles for governance in the areas of artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Mr. Proudman emphasized that a prudential regulator must understand how the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning within financial services is evolving and how the resulting risks can best be mitigated through banks’ internal governance and through systems and controls. Despite the plethora of anecdotal evidence on the adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning, there is little structured evidence about UK financial services. To gather more evidence, BoE and FCA sent a survey in March to more than 200 firms, including the most significant banks, building societies, insurance companies, and financial market infrastructure firms in the UK. The full results of the survey will be published by the BoE and FCA in the third quarter of 2019. However, responses were returned in late April, so some early indicative results are emerging.
Overall, the mood around implementation of artificial intelligence among firms regulated by BoE is strategic but cautious, said Mr. Proudman. Four-fifth of the firms surveyed returned a response; many reported that they are in the process of building the infrastructure necessary for larger scale deployment of artificial intelligence and 80% reported using machine learning applications in some form. The median firm reported deploying six distinct such applications and expected three further applications to go live over the next year, with ten more over the following three years. Barriers to deployment of artificial intelligence seem to be mostly internal to firms, rather than stemming from regulation. Some of the main reasons include legacy systems and unsuitable IT infrastructure; lack of access to sufficient data; and challenges in integrating machine learning into existing business processes.
He concluded his speech by describing three principles for governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning, based on his observations. First, the observation that the introduction of artificial intelligence and machine learning poses significant challenges around the proper use of data, suggests that boards should attach priority to the governance of data—what data should be used; how should it be modeled and tested; and whether the outcomes derived from the data are correct. Second, the observation that the introduction of artificial intelligence and machine learning does not eliminate the role of human incentives in delivering good or bad outcomes, but transforms them, implies that boards should continue to focus on the oversight of human incentives and accountabilities. Third, the acceleration in the rate of introduction of artificial intelligence and machine learning will create increased execution risks during the transition that need to be overseen. Boards should reflect on the range of skill sets and controls that are required to mitigate these risks both at senior level and throughout the organization.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, FMI, Fintech, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Governance, Big Data, FCA, BoE
Previous ArticleIOSCO Report on Market Fragmentation and Cross-Border Regulation
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.