FSB published public responses to the consultation on recommendations for consistent national reporting of data on the use of compensation tools to address misconduct risk. FSB expects to publish the final recommendations in late 2018.
The consultation was published on May 07 and it ended on July 06, 2018. FSB published responses from eleven entities, namely Association of Supervisors of Banks of the Americas, Bank Policy Institute, FirstRand, Global Federation of Insurance Associations, Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA) and Institute of International Finance (IIF), International Insurance Foundation, Italian Banking Association, Japanese Bankers Association, National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Nordic Financial Unions, and Standard Chartered. The recommendations are a part of the 2015 workplan of FSB on measures to reduce misconduct risk.
At the time of consultation, FSB had highlighted that the recommendations must be viewed in light of the existing national laws and in a manner consistent with the supervisory powers individual regulators have been granted. Decisions on the scope of data gathering, the types of data, and the appropriate data gathering cycle and frequency are solely for national supervisory authorities to make; such decisions should consider the types of supervisory work conducted, the relevant legislative and regulatory framework, the extent to which data is already collected, whether the firm is a significant financial institution, and the specific risk profile or financial activities of the firm.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Misconduct Risk, Compensation Reporting, Recommendations, Responses to Consultation, FSB
Previous ArticleFCA Policy Statements on Extension of SM&CR to Firms and Insurers
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.