ECB published a working paper that investigates the costs and benefits of liquidity regulation. The authors find that liquidity tools are beneficial but cannot completely remove the need for Lender of Last Resort (LOLR) interventions by the central bank.
The paper investigated the extent to which the two main liquidity ratios (Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, and the Net Stable Funding Ratio, or NSFR) might have been effective in reducing liquidity take-up by European banks during the post-Lehman crisis as well as the European Sovereign Debt crisis. It was found that full compliance with the current LCR and NSFR rules would have reduced banks’ reliance on publicly provided liquidity during the global financial crisis, without removing such assistance altogether. Nevertheless, the evidence also suggested that liquidity regulations (at least as currently specified) would not have prevented the need for large public liquidity assistance for European banks. The empirical results, therefore, pointed to caution against expecting the end of LOLR interventions due to the application of the current liquidity policy tools.
The authors estimated the cost for banks of complying with the LCR and NSFR and found that these costs turn out to be non-trivial but small, especially when compared with the costs of capital requirements. When the introduction of the LCR and NSFR was simulated in two structural macro-financial models, it was found that the regulations would lead to relatively modest declines in lending and real activity. The analysis, therefore, suggested that while the LCR and NSFR do not have financial stability benefits on a par with bank capital requirements, they are still useful due to their relatively low cost.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Liquidity Risk, LCR, NSFR, Basel III, ECB
Previous ArticleFCA Consults on Handbook Changes Related to European MMF Regulation
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
MAS revised the guidelines that address technology and cyber risks of financial institutions, in an environment of growing use of cloud technologies, application programming interfaces, and rapid software development.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.