ESMA published details of its action plan (within its updated Q&As on MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics) for systematic internalizer regime calculations, ahead of their publication on August 01, 2018. The action plan of ESMA focuses on equity, equity-like instruments, and bonds while postponing the publication for derivatives and other instruments to February 01, 2019.
ESMA will publish results only if trading venues have submitted data for at least 95% of all trading days and will not trigger publication if the quality of the data received for an instrument is not considered sufficient. The data publications will also incorporate OTC trading to the extent it has been reported to ESMA. The updated implementation schedule means ESMA will publish the necessary EU wide data, for the first time by:
- August 01, 2018—covering a period from 3 January 2018 to 30 June 2018 for equity, equity-like and bond instruments. Investment firms will then have to perform their first assessment and, where appropriate, comply with the systematic internalizer obligations by September 01, 2018.
- February 01, 2019—covering a period from July 01, 2018 to December 31, 2018 for ETCs, ETNs, SFPs, securitized derivatives, emission allowances and derivatives. Systematic internalizers will have to eventually comply with the obligations from March 01, 2019.
ESMA publications will be updated on a quarterly basis in respect of a rolling six-month assessment period. Investment firms are expected to self-assess and comply after a reduced two-week period. ESMA notes that, for the systematic internalizer calculations, having a high level of completeness in the reported information is crucial. The updated Q&As on MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics also provide clarification on reporting of a new ISIN in FIRDS and FITRS following a corporate action and on application of the DVC to instruments that have been subject to a corporate action.
To reach comprehensive results ahead of publication on August 01, additional work is required by ESMA, national competent authorities, and trading venues. To achieve a high completeness ratio allowing results to be published for a high number of instruments, ESMA has performed a first completeness check of the data available in the system for the period January 03 to June 01, 2018 at the beginning of June. Based on this work, ESMA has liaised with national competent authorities and trading venues to increase the completeness rate as quickly as possible.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, MiFID II, MiFIR, Transparency, Systematic Internalizers, Q&A, ESMA
Previous ArticleDubai FSA Updates Rulebook and Sourcebook for Financial Institutions
FSB finalized the toolkit of effective practices to assist financial institutions in their cyber incident response and recovery activities.
HKMA urged authorized institutions to take early action to adhere to the IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, which ISDA is expected to publish soon.
FSB published a global transition roadmap for London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
HM Treasury published a document that summarizes the responses received from a consultation on the approach of UK to transposition of the revised Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD2).
HM Treasury published the government response to the feedback received on the consultation for updating the prudential regime of UK before the end of the Brexit transition period.
In a recent statistical notice, BoE announced publication of the reporting schedule for statistical returns for 2021.
EC welcomed the joint declaration by 25 EU member states on building the next generation of cloud in Europe.
MAS published amendments to Notice 648 on the issuance of covered bonds by banks incorporated in Singapore.
FDIC has selected 14 technology companies—including Accenture Federal Services, LLC, Fed Reporter, Inc, and S&P Global Market Intelligence, LLC—for inclusion in the next phase of the rapid prototyping competition.
GLEIF announced that financial institutions worldwide can realize a variety of cost, efficiency, and customer experience benefits by assuming a new “validation agent” role within the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) System.