EBA and ESMA are proposing to revise the joint guidelines for assessing the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders. The proposed revisions reflect the amendments introduced by the fifth Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) and the Investment Firms Directive in relation to the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body. The draft joint guidelines also take into account the recovery and resolution framework introduced by the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and provide further guidance in this regard. The joint EBA and ESMA guidelines will apply to competent authorities across EU as well as to institutions on a solo and consolidated basis. The consultation runs until October 31, 2020 and the finalized guidelines are expected to enter into force six months after their publication.
EBA points out that uncovering any involvement of credit institutions and investment firms in money laundering and terrorist financing can have an impact on the viability and trust in the financial system. In this context, the proposed revisions to the joint guidelines clarify that the knowledge, experience, and skill requirements are important aspects in the fit and proper assessment of members of the management body and key function holders, as they contribute to identifying, managing, and mitigating money laundering and financing of terrorism risks. The proposed revisions to the guidelines also clarify that being a member of affiliated companies or affiliated entities does not in itself represent an obstacle for a member of the management body to acting with independence of mind. The guidelines further specify that a gender-balanced composition of the management body is of particular importance. Institutions should respect the principle of equal opportunities for any gender and take measures to improve a more gender-balanced composition of staff in management positions. Annex I to the guidelines presents instructions and template for suitability matrix to assess the collective competence of members of the management body. The Annex has been amended to include compliance with the requirements related to anti-money laundering and combating of terrorist financing, but stays otherwise unchanged.
In accordance with the requirements introduced by the Capital Requirements Directive (2013/36/EU)—as amended by CRD5 (2019/878/EU)—and the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive or MiFID II (2014/65/EU), the joint guidelines of EBA and ESMA cover the notions of suitability and the assessment of suitability by institutions and competent authorities. Overall, the guidelines apply to all institutions, independent of their governance structures (unitary board, dual board, or other structures), without advocating or preferring any specific structure as set out in the defined scope of application. The guidelines specify that all institutions have to assess the members of the management body. Competent authorities should ensure that credit institutions, financial and mixed financial holding companies, and investment firms comply with these guidelines. Institutions that are subject to CRD also have to assess all key function holders that have a significant influence over the direction of the institution under the overall responsibility of the management body. For significant "CRD" institutions, competent authorities should assess the heads of internal control functions and the chief financial officer (CFO), where they are not members of the management body.
- Press Release
- Consultation with Tracked Changes (PDF)
- Suitability Matrix Template and Instructions (XLSX)
Comment Due Date: October 31, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Governance, CRD, BRRD, Guidelines Suitability Assessment, IFD, Operational Risk, Basel, EBA, ESMA
HKMA urged authorized institutions to take early action to adhere to the IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, which ISDA is expected to publish soon.
FSB published a global transition roadmap for London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
HM Treasury published a document that summarizes the responses received from a consultation on the approach of UK to transposition of the revised Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD2).
HM Treasury published the government response to the feedback received on the consultation for updating the prudential regime of UK before the end of the Brexit transition period.
PRA published the final policy statement PS22/20, which contains the updated supervisory statement SS12/13 on counterparty credit risk.
FSB published an update on its work to address market fragmentation. FSB is working in this area in collaboration with the other standard-setting bodies.
EBA proposed revisions to the guidelines on major incident reporting under the second Payment Service Directive (PSD2).
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the methodology for prudential treatment of software assets by banks.
FSB published a report presenting the roadmap to enhance cross-border payments by providing a high-level plan that sets ambitious but achievable goals and milestones in the five focus areas.
In a recent communication, EIOPA urged the insurance sector to complete its preparations for the end of the Brexit transition period on December 31, 2020.