IMF published its staff report and selected issues report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with Indonesia. IMF Directors welcomed the appropriate focus of the near-term policy mix on protecting macro-economic and financial stability, safeguarding buffers, and addressing vulnerabilities. Directors welcomed the progress in strengthening the frameworks for financial oversight and crisis management in recent years, in line with recommendations of the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). Going forward, they encouraged the authorities to focus on the identified improvement areas, including clarifying institutional mandates, improving supervision of non-bank financial institutions and financial conglomerates, strengthening the legal framework for financial oversight, and enhancing crisis management frameworks.
The staff report highlights that, overall, the banking system remains sound. Corporate foreign-exchange regulations helped corporates increase the share of hedged foreign-exchange loans; however, elevated foreign-currency debt of corporates leave them exposed to rupiah volatility. This could have spillovers to the banking sector, as most bank loans (52%) are extended to the corporate sector. The banking system is well-capitalized and profitability is high, with return on assets at 2.5%. System-wide liquidity remains adequate, although some small non-systemic banks are vulnerable to liquidity shock, including foreign-exchange liquidity shortfalls. Non-performing loans (NPLs) have stabilized at 2.4% and are expected to decline further, though the share of problem loans (the sum of NPLs, special mention, and restructured loans) remains high at about 9% of total loans.
The national authorities have taken several actions in line with the FSAP recommendations. Basel III standards have been implemented—a regulation on large exposures and a consultation paper for leverage ratio were published in December 2018 and January 2019, respectively. Bank Indonesia and OJK continue to improve their stress test framework, including corporate vulnerability analysis, and have implemented a joint stress test with Bank Indonesia's top-down and OJK’s bottom-up tests. Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS) has issued regulations on systemic and non-systemic bank resolution and on bank restructuring. Building on this progress, further efforts are needed to strengthen financial oversight and crisis management. Specifically, there is a need to complete the new legal framework for financial sector agencies and the resolution regime, in line with the FSAP recommendations. In addition, OJK should continue efforts to strengthen enforcement of prudential regulations, including regulations on credit and risk management and supervision of financial conglomerates. Finally, stronger coordination between LPS and OJK on bank recovery and resolution will further strengthen the crisis management framework.
The assessment highlights that legal upgrades are needed to align and strengthen the mandates and toolkits of Bank Indonesia, OJK, and LPS to lay the foundations for sustainable financial deepening. The legal upgrades needed include introducing a financial stability mandate for Bank Indonesia and giving primacy to the financial stability objective for OJK; clearly specifying the statutory objectives of LPS, including to protect insured depositors; and improving legal protection for staff. Technological innovation offers a promising channel to overcome the unique geographical barriers to financial inclusion in Indonesia. Pursuing the implementation of the Bali Fintech agenda will support financial inclusion. However, financial innovation may give rise to financial stability and integrity risks through the growing role of new firms or activities that lie outside the current regulatory perimeter as well as through increased exposure to cyber-attacks. To secure the benefits of financial innovation, supervisors should include cyber-security in the regular monitoring and audits of financial institutions.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Indonesia, Banking, Securities, FSAP, Article IV, NPLs, Financial Stability, Systemic Risk, Basel III, Stress Testing, Fintech, Crisis Management, OJK, IMF
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.