Featured Product

    EBA Publishes Results of 2021 Stress Test Exercise for Banks

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published results of the EU-wide stress test for 2021. Overall, the stress test exercise covered 89 banks that are all supervised by ECB: these comprise 38 euro area banks that are part of the EU-wide stress test led by EBA and a further 51 medium-size euro area banks. Together they represent slightly more than 75% of the total banking assets in the euro area, as per the ECB notification. The competent authorities are expected to use results of the stress test to assess the ability of banks to meet applicable minimum and additional own funds requirements under the common downturn scenarios and assumptions. In parallel to its 2021 EU‐wide stress test, EBA continued working to improve the existing stress testing framework, with a final decision on potential changes to the framework expected later in 2021 and the implementation of these changes expected in the 2023 EU‐wide stress test.

    ECB notes that the results of the 2021 stress test show that the euro area banking system is resilient to adverse economic developments. For the 38 banks tested by the EBA, the average common equity tier 1 capital ratio fell by 5 percentage points from 14.7% to stand at 9.7%. The 51 medium-size banks tested solely by ECB showed an average capital depletion of 6.8 percentage points to 11.3%, from a starting point of 18.1%. The results show that the first key driver of the capital depletion was credit risk, because the economic shock in the adverse scenario led to loan losses. Despite the overall resilience of the banking system, new challenges have emerged from the COVID-19 pandemic and banks need to ensure that they properly measure and manage credit risk. The second main driver of capital depletion was market risk while the third driver was the limited ability to generate income under adverse economic conditions. ECB also noted that this year the Banking Supervision will apply a new methodology to determine the Pillar 2 Guidance. The Pillar 2 Guidance is a supervisory recommendation that tells banks how much capital they are expected to maintain to be able to withstand stressed situations. ECB intends to give banks sufficient time to replenish their capital if the Pillar 2 Guidance levels increase.

    As per EBA, this year’s stress test is characterized by an adverse scenario that assumes a prolonged COVID-19 scenario in a “lower for longer” interest rate environment. With a cumulative drop in GDP over the three-year horizon by 3.6% in European Union and a negative cumulative drop in the GDP of every member state, the 2021 adverse scenario is very severe, also having in mind the weaker macroeconomic starting point in 2020 as a result of the pandemic. The baseline scenario also provides some comparable information about individual banks in the context of a gradual exit from the pandemic. Under the adverse scenario, the banking system would see its common equity tier 1 capital reduced by 485 bps on a fully loaded basis after three years, while staying above 10% (against the starting ratio of 15%). The results also show dispersion across banks, with the banks that are more focused on domestic activities or with lower net interest income displaying a higher depletion. The overall impact results in a common equity tier 1 depletion of EUR 265 billion and in an increase of the total risk exposure amount of EUR 868 billion at the end of the three-year horizon, resulting in a 485 bps decrease in the common equity tier 1 ratio. The key risk drivers contributing to the overall impact on common equity tier 1 capital ratio on a fully loaded basis include credit risk losses (of EUR 308 billion); market risk losses, including counterparty credit risk (EUR 74 billion); and operational risk losses, including conduct risk (EUR 49 billion). With respect to the COVID-19 support, the results show a higher increase of the stage 3 ratio over the stress test horizon for loans under moratoria (from 3.1% to 13.4%). For exposures under the Public Guarantee Scheme, the stage 3 ratio reaches 6.8% in 2023 (1.1% in 2020).


    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Stress Testing, COVID-19, Regulatory Capital, Stress Test Results, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, FAQ, Counterparty Credit Risk, Pillar 2, SREP, ECB, EBA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles

    EBA Proposes Standards for IRRBB Reporting Under Basel Framework

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed implementing technical standards on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) reporting requirements, with the comment period ending on May 02, 2023.

    January 31, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    FED Issues Further Details on Pilot Climate Scenario Analysis Exercise

    The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FED) set out details of the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise to be conducted among the six largest U.S. bank holding companies.

    January 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    US Agencies Issue Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates

    The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.

    January 04, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    ECB Issues Multiple Reports and Regulatory Updates for Banks

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.

    January 01, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    HKMA Keeps List of D-SIBs Unchanged, Makes Other Announcements

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.

    December 30, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EU Issues FAQs on Taxonomy Regulation, Rules Under CRD, FICOD and SFDR

    The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.

    December 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    CBIRC Revises Measures on Corporate Governance Supervision

    The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.

    December 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    HKMA Publications Address Sustainability Issues in Financial Sector

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.

    December 23, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Updates Address Basel and NPL Requirements for Banks

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.

    December 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    ESMA Publishes 2022 ESEF XBRL Taxonomy and Conformance Suite

    The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.

    December 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8699