PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II. The guidance includes clarifications and enhanced transparency on the existing position regarding external audit of the matching adjustment. The consultation closes on October 30, 2020. The proposals in CP11/20 would result in changes to the supervisory statement SS11/16 on the external audit of, and responsibilities of the governing body in relation to, the public disclosure requirement with reference to Solvency II. The draft changes to SS11/16 have been proposed to take effect from December 31, 2020.
These proposals build on the existing Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR) audit requirements that have been set out in the External Audit Part. They also complement the guidance that already exists in relation to the matching adjustment and audit of the SFCR. The main matching adjustment requirements can broadly be divided into those that affect the scale of the benefit calculated, those that affect eligibility, and those that affect the way that the matching adjustment is applied. The first of these, the impact of the matching adjustment on technical provisions, falls within the "relevant elements" that are taken into account as part of the external audit of the SFCR. In addition, the matching adjustment has a direct impact on technical provisions that are part of the relevant elements subject to audit. In addition to the above clarifications, PRA proposed the following new expectations of auditors in relation to the matching adjustment:
- If an auditor becomes aware, through the course of its work, that a firm may not be compliant with matching adjustment requirements, then PRA would expect the auditor to inform the firm in the first instance. Auditors may also choose to remind the firm of the requirement in Technical Provisions for the firm to inform PRA if it is not able to comply with the conditions specified and to take the necessary measures to restore compliance as soon as possible. Sharing such information with PRA may help to make best use of information known by auditors to further supervisory objectives
- If a firm materially changes its approach to calculating the matching adjustment, then PRA would usually expect this to be discussed by the firm with the supervisory team. However, if the auditor is aware that PRA has not been informed of such a change then it would be expected to pass this information to PRA. This sharing of information would allow PRA to consider whether it wishes to review the new calculation methodology or the scale of the matching adjustment. This may also help PRA to consider whether the firm continues to meet the requirements and any expectations that are set out in its supervisory statements.
The proposals would be expected to bring increased clarity and transparency to how matching adjustment should be considered as part of the external audit of SFCR. The proposals are intended to ensure clarity for SFCR users about the extent to which auditors have taken account of the matching adjustment in their audit opinions and for the auditor on how it should incorporate information about the matching adjustment into its overall SFCR opinion. CP11/20 is relevant to UK Solvency II firms (including mutuals) that have approval to make use of the matching adjustment, especially those that are subject to an audit requirement in respect of their SFCR. It is also relevant for the auditors of such organizations and the users of these SFCRs. PRA aims to clarify the requirements and expectations for auditors that form a view on the matching adjustment as part of their audit of the SFCR. PRA has assessed that the proposals would not need to be amended under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Comment Due Date: October 30, 2020
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Solvency II, Matching Adjustment, Technical Provisions, CP11/20, SFCR, External Audit, PRA
Previous ArticleUK Authorities Update Timeline of Key Regulatory Initiatives
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.