FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany. The report also addresses how the authorities assess and manage financial stability risks from non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI). The review focuses on the steps taken by the authorities to implement reforms in this area, including by following up on the relevant Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) and FSB recommendations. The review finds that the macro-prudential framework in Germany is well-established and is implemented through the Financial Stability Committee (FSC). Nevertheless, it makes recommendations for German authorities to further strengthen the macro-prudential framework.
The review finds that data collection, quality, and integration have improved. In addition, effective cooperation between the member authorities of FSC—Bundesbank, BaFin, and the Federal Ministry of Finance—has enhanced the analytical capabilities to assess financial stability risks. FSC has further developed the macro-prudential toolkit in recent years, with the establishment of two borrower-based tools designed to address potential financial stability risks stemming from the residential real estate market. These tools apply to both banks and non-bank financial institutions, but so far have not been activated. The efforts of the authorities to monitor and manage risks to financial stability from NBFI have increased as the importance of the sector has grown, most notably with respect to investment funds, while the set of liquidity management and pricing tools available to asset managers was recently extended. Notwithstanding this progress, the review concludes that further steps can be taken to strengthen the macro-prudential framework by:
- Enhancing data collection for macro-prudential analysis, in particular on residential real estate loans, NBFI, and interconnectedness
- Strengthening the FSC’s public communication and its analysis of non-bank and emerging risks
- Extending the policy toolkit to include income-based instruments for residential real estate financing and providing guidance on the use of liquidity risk management and pricing tools for investment funds, particularly in stressed market conditions
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, Peer Review, Macro-Prudential Framework, Macro-Prudential Tools, Residential Real Estate, Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, Basel, NBFI, FSC, FSB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.