FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany. The report also addresses how the authorities assess and manage financial stability risks from non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI). The review focuses on the steps taken by the authorities to implement reforms in this area, including by following up on the relevant Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) and FSB recommendations. The review finds that the macro-prudential framework in Germany is well-established and is implemented through the Financial Stability Committee (FSC). Nevertheless, it makes recommendations for German authorities to further strengthen the macro-prudential framework.
The review finds that data collection, quality, and integration have improved. In addition, effective cooperation between the member authorities of FSC—Bundesbank, BaFin, and the Federal Ministry of Finance—has enhanced the analytical capabilities to assess financial stability risks. FSC has further developed the macro-prudential toolkit in recent years, with the establishment of two borrower-based tools designed to address potential financial stability risks stemming from the residential real estate market. These tools apply to both banks and non-bank financial institutions, but so far have not been activated. The efforts of the authorities to monitor and manage risks to financial stability from NBFI have increased as the importance of the sector has grown, most notably with respect to investment funds, while the set of liquidity management and pricing tools available to asset managers was recently extended. Notwithstanding this progress, the review concludes that further steps can be taken to strengthen the macro-prudential framework by:
- Enhancing data collection for macro-prudential analysis, in particular on residential real estate loans, NBFI, and interconnectedness
- Strengthening the FSC’s public communication and its analysis of non-bank and emerging risks
- Extending the policy toolkit to include income-based instruments for residential real estate financing and providing guidance on the use of liquidity risk management and pricing tools for investment funds, particularly in stressed market conditions
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, Peer Review, Macro-Prudential Framework, Macro-Prudential Tools, Residential Real Estate, Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, Basel, NBFI, FSC, FSB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.