The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) decided to cancel Notice 606 on the provision for and writing off of bad debts with effect from July 21, 2022. Notice 606 had set out the requirements for all banks in Singapore to maintain adequate provisions for bad and doubtful debts as well as requirements to seek MAS approval before writing off bad debts to certain related parties. Additionally, MAS revised notice 637 on risk-based capital adequacy requirements for locally incorporated full and wholesale banks. The revised Notice 637 will take effect on January 01, 2023.
Notice 637 sets out the capital adequacy ratio and leverage ratio requirements for a locally incorporated banks, along with the methodology and process for calculating these ratios. The notice sets out the internal capital adequacy assessment process requirements as well as public disclosure requirements for a bank in relation to its capital adequacy and risk exposures. The MAS Notice 637 (Amendment) 2022 reflects changes to the MAS Notice 637 to:
- implement the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements for the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) that have been published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- implement a -100bps interest rate floor on the post-shock interest rates under the standardized interest rate shock scenarios set out in Annex 10C of MAS Notice 637
- provide additional clarity on the application of interest rate floors, interest rate caps, and pass-through rates when computing IRRBB under the standardized interest rate shock scenarios
- implement various other technical revisions
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Reporting, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Notice 637, Notice 606, Credit Risk, Leverage Ratio, Pillar 3, Disclosures, IRRBB, ICAAP, MAS
Previous ArticleCSSF Updates Address SFDR and Sustainability Risk in Existing Rules
Next ArticleOFR Launches Pilot of Climate Data and Analytics Hub
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.