IASB Proposes to Amend Requirements for Insurers Applying IFRS 9
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) proposed a narrow-scope amendment to the transition requirements in IFRS 17 on insurance contracts. The proposed amendment relates to financial assets for which comparative information presented on the initial application of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 on financial instruments has not been restated for IFRS 9. Applying the proposed amendment, a company would be permitted to present comparative information about such a financial asset as if the classification and measurement requirements of IFRS 9 had been applied to that financial asset. The comment period is open until September 27, 2021, with the Board planning to complete any resulting amendment by the end of 2021.
Many insurers will apply IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 for the first time from 2023 and are at an advanced stage of preparing to apply these new standards. However, some of these insurers have informed IASB about significant temporary accounting mismatches on initial application of the new standards that can make the change in accounting more difficult to communicate to investors. These mismatches arise in circumstances when IFRS 9 is not reflected in the accounting for financial assets in the prior periods presented when IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 are first applied. The proposed narrow-scope amendment to IFRS 17 would enable the insurers to address this issue by giving them an option to present comparative information for certain financial assets in a manner consistent with IFRS 9.
IASB acknowledged that amending IFRS 17 so close to the effective date might appear to be inconsistent with the intention of providing a stable basis for the implementation of IFRS 17. However, in the Board’s view, introducing new transition relief at this stage is justified because entities became aware of the significant impact of the differing transition requirements, in particular the potential magnitude of accounting mismatches, only during the advanced stage of implementation. Furthermore, the Board concluded that the proposed amendment could be finalized in a timely manner without disrupting implementation because the proposed classification overlay is an optional relief and, therefore, would not impose changes on entities; moreover, this relates only to the presentation of comparative information on initial application and has no effect on the application of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 after the date of initial application. The proposed amendment does not affect any other requirement in IFRS 17 and does not propose any change to the transition requirements in IFRS 9.
Comment Due Date: September 27, 2021
Keywords: International, Insurance, IFRS 17, IFRS 9, Insurance Contracts, Reporting, Financial Instruments, IASB
Featured Experts
Masha Muzyka
CECL, IFRS 9, and IFRS 17 expert; credit risk and insurance risk specialist; strategic planning and credit analytics solutions consultant
Scott Dietz
Scott is a Director in the Regulatory and Accounting Solutions team responsible for providing accounting expertise across solutions, products, and services offered by Moody’s Analytics in the US. He has over 15 years of experience leading auditing, consulting and accounting policy initiatives for financial institutions.
Dieter Van der Stock
IFRS subject matter expert; LDTI subject matter expert; accounting authority; risk management specialist
Previous Article
EBA Guide to Monitor Threshold for Intermediate Parent UndertakingsRelated Articles
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
Global Agencies Focus on ESG Data, Climate Litigation and Nature Risks
At the global level, supervisory efforts are increasingly focused on addressing climate risks via better quality data and innovative use of technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.
ISSB Standards Shine Spotlight on Comparability of ESG Disclosures
The finalization of the IFRS sustainability disclosure standards in late June 2023 has brought to the forefront the themes of the harmonization of sustainability disclosures
EBA Issues Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently issued several regulatory publications impacting the banking sector.
BCBS Proposes to Revise Core Principles for Banking Supervision
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched a consultation on revisions to the core principles for effective banking supervision, with the comment period ending on October 06, 2023.
US Proposes Final Basel Rules, Transition Period to Start in July 2025
The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame.
FSB Report Outlines Next Steps for Climate Risk Roadmap
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) recently published the second annual progress report on the July 2021 roadmap to address climate-related financial risks.
EBA Plans on Ad-hoc ESG Data Collection and Climate Scenario Exercise
The recognition of climate change as a systemic risk to the global economy has further intensified regulatory and supervisory focus on monitoring of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.
