EBA published an opinion on the link between money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) concerns and prudential objectives. This opinion forms part of the ongoing work of EBA to strengthen the fight against ML/TF in Europe and responds to a request in the Council Anti Money Laundering Action Plan of 2018. With this opinion, EBA invites prudential supervisors to send a common message to institutions that prudential supervisors factor anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) issues into the prudential supervisory process and cooperate closely with AML/CFT supervisors for this purpose.
ML/TF can have a significant, adverse impact on an institution's safety and soundness. This is why prudential supervisors need to be aware of, and act on, ML/TF risks, which may pose prudential risks to the institutions they supervise and in particular:
- When considering whether to authorize an institution or when assessing proposed acquisitions of qualifying holdings
- As part of their ongoing supervision of institutions, for example, when assessing the adequacy of the governance and risk management systems of an institution
- When taking corrective measures to address potential weaknesses from a prudential perspective
EU legislators have taken a number of steps to clarify and strengthen the important link between AML/CFT and prudential issues and to complement the existing legal framework in EU. These steps include amendments to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), which further clarify the link between prudential supervision and AML/CFT supervision and require prudential supervisors to act on AML/CFT information. The EU Council made clear in its action plan of 2018 that the link between ML/TF risk and prudential objectives means that prudential and AML/CFT supervisors must cooperate closely and share information in the discharge of their respective functions. Where institutions operate across borders, EBA expects supervisors to cooperate with their international counterparts.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, AML/CFT, ML/TF, SREP, AML Action Plan, CRD, Prudential Supervision, EBA
Previous ArticleECB Vice President Discusses Evolution of Stress Testing in Europe
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting