Featured Product

    BIS Bulletin Examines Bank Resilience During COVID-19 Crisis

    July 22, 2021

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a Bulletin that compares phases of the COVID-19 crisis with the Great Financial Crisis to assesses resilience of the largest banks through the concept of a market-adjusted, risk-weighted capital ratio (MARC) as well as through the outcome of stress tests. The MARC combines information from regulatory book value metrics with market valuation measures to provide a composite view on bank resilience. The analysis reveals that, while market valuations have largely recovered to pre-pandemic levels, a weaker tail of banks continues to struggle with anemic profitability and potential for credit losses. The resilience of these banks could be tested if credit losses materialize, following the winding down of policy support.

    The analysis, which covered 360 of the largest 500 institutions from 50 jurisdictions, reveals that a forward-looking view on bank resilience can be obtained through a combination of regulatory capital ratios, market valuations, and insights from stress tests. The data show that market valuations have broadly recovered from the troughs observed at the onset of the pandemic. Although bank resilience has been buttressed by the capital and liquidity buffers raised after the Great Financial Crisis, the weaker banks, mainly from Asia and Europe, appear particularly exposed to potential setbacks in economic growth and an associated increase of credit losses once crisis-related policy support and prudential relief are phased out. In a downside scenario, there is a risk of chronically weak banks being tied to chronically weak borrowers (zombie firms). As economies recover from the crisis, efforts to address pre-existing structural vulnerabilities in the banking sector need to be reinvigorated. Against this backdrop, policymakers face the challenge of phasing out policy support without jeopardizing the recovery. Flexible, state-contingent approaches to adjusting or withdrawing support are needed. This calls for targeted measures that require beneficiaries to opt-in, while making the terms of support progressively less generous. Supervisory authorities will need to balance a supportive macro-prudential stance with timely recognition of bank losses to encourage balance sheet repair and support the monitoring of bank resilience. 

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, COVID-19, Stress Testing, Regulatory Capital, MARC, Credit Risk, Non-Performing Loans, Expected Credit Loss, Basel, BIS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline

    The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.

    September 18, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance

    Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.

    September 18, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.

    September 14, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Global Agencies Focus on ESG Data, Climate Litigation and Nature Risks

    At the global level, supervisory efforts are increasingly focused on addressing climate risks via better quality data and innovative use of technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.

    September 14, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISSB Standards Shine Spotlight on Comparability of ESG Disclosures

    The finalization of the IFRS sustainability disclosure standards in late June 2023 has brought to the forefront the themes of the harmonization of sustainability disclosures

    August 22, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently issued several regulatory publications impacting the banking sector.

    August 10, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Proposes to Revise Core Principles for Banking Supervision

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched a consultation on revisions to the core principles for effective banking supervision, with the comment period ending on October 06, 2023.

    August 04, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Proposes Final Basel Rules, Transition Period to Start in July 2025

    The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame.

    August 04, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Report Outlines Next Steps for Climate Risk Roadmap

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) recently published the second annual progress report on the July 2021 roadmap to address climate-related financial risks.

    August 04, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Plans on Ad-hoc ESG Data Collection and Climate Scenario Exercise

    The recognition of climate change as a systemic risk to the global economy has further intensified regulatory and supervisory focus on monitoring of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.

    July 31, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8931