Featured Product

    HKMA Consults on Policy Module for Climate Risk Management

    July 20, 2021

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on a draft Supervisory Policy Manual (SPM) module GS-1 on climate risk management. The module offers guidance, to authorized institutions, on the key elements of climate risk management by describing the regulator's approach and expectations with respect to reviewing the climate risk management by authorized institutions. The comment period for this consultation ends on August 20, 2021.

    In developing this module, HKMA has not only drawn on the relevant work of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) but has also considered the industry practices in managing climate risks. The module sets out requirements with regard to authorized institutions' governance, strategy, risk management, and disclosures in building climate resilience:

    • Governance. The board has primary responsibility for climate resilience for authorized institutions whereas the senior management is responsible for the proper functioning of the or authorized institutions' risk management framework and for driving necessary changes in addressing climate related issues. This includes ensuring the effectiveness of the framework through regular review, formulation, and implementation of relevant policies and processes. The senior management should put in place effective escalation channels for reporting material risks and exceptions.
    • Strategy. Authorized institutions should embed climate considerations throughout the current strategy formulation process, from strategic assessment to action plan development. They should ensure the effective implementation of their strategy for addressing climate-related issues by properly aligning internal resources and processes, and managing relevant changes. Organizational structures, business policies, processes and resources availability should be reviewed.
    • Risk management. An appropriate framework for managing climate-related risks should be based on a comprehensive assessment on how, and to what extent, climate change would affect an authorized institutions' portfolios and operations. In view of the unique characteristics of climate change, the financial, reputational, and strategic risk implications should be properly considered. Authorized institutions are expected to have sufficient understanding of how climate risks could be transmitted into the traditional risks faced by them and assess the potential impact on their business. They should adopt the techniques of climate-focused scenario analysis and stress testing to regularly assess vulnerability under different plausible climate scenarios; they should also implement processes to monitor and report exposures to climate risks to ensure that such exposures are consistent with their risk appetite. 
    • Disclosures. Authorized institutions should develop an appropriate approach to disclosing climate-related information to enhance transparency. At a minimum, authorized institutions should make climate-related disclosures aligned with the recommendations from the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, also known as TCFD.

    The locally incorporated authorized institutions should apply these requirements on a solo-entity basis and, where applicable, on a consolidated basis covering their subsidiaries. To the extent practicable and if the risks are assessed as material, they should also consider applying it to their associated companies and joint ventures. This module should be read in conjunction with other relevant modules of SPM including IC-1 on risk management framework, IC-5 on stress testing, and the various modules on the effective management of the relevant inherent risks such as RR1 on reputational risk and SR-1 on strategic risk. While this module focuses on climate risk management, authorized institutions should not overlook the risks and opportunities from other environmental and sustainability related issues. This would better enable an authorized institution to deal with the challenges posed by increasing expectation of its stakeholders and the public on this front. 


    Comment Due Date: August 20, 2021

    Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Climate Change Risk, ESG, GS 1, Supervisory Policy Manual, Governance, Disclosures, TCFD, Stress Testing, Scenario Analysis, HKMA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles

    ESAs Issue Multiple Regulatory Updates for Financial Sector Entities

    The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.

    November 15, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    ISSB Makes Announcements at COP27; IASB to Propose IFRS 9 Amendments

    The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.

    November 10, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    IOSCO Prioritizes Green Disclosures, Greenwashing, and Carbon Markets

    The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.

    November 09, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Finalizes Methodology for Stress Tests, Issues Other Updates

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups

    November 09, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    OSFI Sets Out Work Priorities and Reporting Updates for Banks

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.

    November 07, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    APRA Finalizes Changes to Capital Framework, Issues Other Updates

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.

    November 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    BIS Hub and Central Banks Conduct CBDC and DeFI Pilots

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.

    November 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    FASB Proposes Improvements to 2023 GAAP Reporting Taxonomy

    The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is seeking comments, until November 03, 2022, on the proposed technical and other conforming improvements for the 2023 GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy.

    November 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    ECB Sets Deadline for Banks to Meet Its Climate Risk Expectations

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.

    November 02, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    ESAs, ECB, & EC Issue Multiple Regulatory Updates for Financial Sector

    Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)

    October 31, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8588