GLEIF published Version 1.1 of the Entity Legal Forms (ELF) Code List, which now lists more than 2,100 entity legal forms across more than 90 jurisdictions. The list contains legal forms in their native language for entities such as limited liability companies (Ltd), Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH), or Société Anonyme (SA). The ELF Code List assigns a unique code to each entity legal form. The ELF code is an alpha-numeric code of four characters from the basic Latin character set.
The ELF Code List is based on the ISO standard 20275 “Financial Services –ELF,” developed by the International Organization for Standardization. Its aim is to enable legal forms within jurisdictions to be codified and thus facilitate the classification of legal entities according to their legal form. Integrating ELF codes into the standardized set of reference data on a legal entity, which is available within the Global LEI Index, further enhances the business card information included in each Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) record.
Going forward, the organizations issuing LEI will reference the ELF code in their LEI issuance processes and reporting. The LEI-Common Data File (CDF) format defines how LEI issuing organizations report their LEI and Level 1 reference data—that is, the business card information on a legal entity. The structure for the ELF code has been incorporated into the LEI-CDF format version 2.1. GLEIF will monitor compliance of LEI issuers with the ELF Code List subject to an ELF code being available for a specific legal entity form in a jurisdiction. Since March 01, 2018, all newly issued LEIs must indicate the applicable ELF code, if available.
- ELF Code List, Version 1.1 (PDF)
- Changes in ELF Version 1.1 Compared to Version 1.0 (XLSX)
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, LEI, ELF Code List, ISO Standard 20275, Global LEI Index, GLEIF
Previous ArticleBaFin on Division of Financial and Traditional Non-Life Reinsurance
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.