Featured Product

    EU Platform Seeks Views on Environmental and Social Taxonomy Proposals

    July 12, 2021

    In the context of a recently launched publication consultation, the European Union (EU) Platform on Sustainable Finance published two draft reports: one on the taxonomy extension options linked to environmental objectives and the other on developing a social taxonomy. The feedback period on these two reports ends on August 27, 2021, with the Platform on Sustainable Finance expected to submit the final reports, and its advice, to the European Commission (EC) in Autumn 2021. This advice will feed into the EC report on potential extension of taxonomy framework to be adopted by the end of 2021, as set out in the Taxonomy Regulation.

    The draft report on taxonomy extension examines the premises, issues, and options for and against extending the EU Taxonomy "beyond green" to include significantly harmful activities and no significant impact activities within the overall EU sustainable finance framework. The report sets out 15 recommendations to build on the existing taxonomy. The Platform recommends that EU Taxonomy should be extended, with a priority given to an extension toward activities causing significant harm. Extended taxonomy must be part of a wider set of EU policy and legislative initiatives aimed at incentivizing finance for urgent transition away from significantly harmful activities, along with building climate-resilience and supporting a greening of the economy. The Platform recommends for EC to issue non-binding guidance to corporates, financial market participants, and other Taxonomy users, on the use of significantly harmful and intermediate performance levels for informing activity-specific investment plans and transition narratives. As another recommendation, the Platform notes that after a decision on an extended significantly harmful activities taxonomy is made, phasing in is rapid—aiming at first reporting by 2023. The Platform recommends that the necessary work to identify activities for which no technological possibility of improving their environmental performance to avoid significant harm exists, referencing all six objectives, is initiated as soon as possible. These recommendations are not final and the Platform will set out the final recommendations later in 2021. The key topics that have been identified for further investigation include outlining of reporting and disclosure options for an extended taxonomy, further consideration on whether a generic, or case by case, approach is required, and the possibility of a Platform guidance document to precede the recommended changes to the Taxonomy Regulation. 

    The draft report on social taxonomy states that the first task of the social taxonomy subgroup of the EU Platform for Sustainable Finance is to suggest a structure for a social taxonomy while keeping in mind what constitutes a substantial social contribution, how to not do significant harm, and what activities are harmful. The suggested structure of a social taxonomy would be both vertical and horizontal, with the vertical dimension focusing on products and services for basic human needs and basic infrastructure. From this perspective, economic activities that make these products and services more accessible, while doing no harm to efforts to achieve other social objectives, could be considered social. The horizontal dimension takes into account impact on different groups of stakeholders affected by economic activities and would be likely to include a combination of entity- and activity-level criteria, crucial for ensuring businesses’ respect and support for human rights as part of the social taxonomy. Built on the foundation of international norms and principles like the sustainable development goals (SDG) and the UN guiding principles for businesses and human rights, a social taxonomy would help investors to contribute to finance solutions around ensuring decent work, enabling inclusive and sustainable communities, and affordable healthcare and housing. A social taxonomy would be a tool to help investors identify opportunities to contribute to these objectives. The work done on the social taxonomy is liable to be incorporated into existing legislative texts such as the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). A social taxonomy is expected to increase the already increasingly heavy reporting burden the NFRD, SFDR, and environmental taxonomy impose on companies, especially as currently there are no standardized social indicators on which companies usually report.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: August 27, 2021

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy Regulation, Social Taxonomy, Climate Change Risk, Social Risk, Environmental Taxonomy, Reporting, Disclosures, EC

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness

    APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).

    December 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance

    The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).

    December 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.

    November 30, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules

    Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR

    EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR

    The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability

    The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7751