Featured Product

    Sam Woods of PRA on Supervision and Regulatory Artibtrage

    July 10, 2017

    PRA published remarks of Sam Woods, the Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation and Chief Executive Officer of PRA, which were published for the May 2017 Building Society Association Annual Conference. He discussed the importance of supervision in banking and insurance sectors and examined how supervision differs from regulation. He also highlighted that “financial institutions will always be able to innovate faster than we are able to modify the prudential rulebook,” warning that some innovation is “pure regulatory arbitrage.”

    Mr. Woods explained that regulation concerns the framework of rules and legal standards that govern the way in which firms operate whereas supervision is the dynamic pursuit of the relevant authority’s statutory objectives, through oversight of firms’ activities. In his view, supervision without regulation, or vice versa, in financial services would be futile. He added that some innovation is “pure regulatory arbitrage," highlighting that firms innovate to reduce specific regulatory requirements without any commensurate reduction in their risk. He gave a few examples of such behavior that might be problematic, despite compliance with the specified rules. For instance, he mentioned that some banks are seeking out funding that matures just beyond the time horizon used to calculate regulatory liquidity requirements. Another example he gave was about how some special purpose vehicles, derivatives, agency structures, or collateral swaps carry material credit risk, which escapes the detailed aspects of the capital framework. He also exemplified that some insurance firms have sought to amend the existing contracts to extend the (Solvency II) contract boundary and recognize more future profit, as firms cannot recognize future premiums on unit-linked savings policies that do not include any insurance cover or financial guarantee of benefits. In this context, he stated that “Consistent with the PRA’s statutory duty, firms should expect questions and should be prepared to defend them according to our principles of prudence, effective risk management, and adequacy of financial resources at all times.”

     

    He observed that “The supervisory approach for banks, building societies, and insurers in the UK has meandered down different paths, at different times—and each at a different pace. Indeed, even when regulation has been laid down in statute, each supervisory agency has taken time to develop and embed its own approach.” PRA supervisors also pay close attention to the emerging trends and potential future risks and supervisors will continue to keep a close eye on the effects of issues on the viability of business models and future strategy for building societies. Finally, he reinforced “that supervision—as distinct from regulation—is vital if we are to ensure that the framework of regulation operates effectively and as intended. Supervisors have an important job to do—defending the reforms put in place following the most recent crisis.”

     

    Related Link: Speech (PDF)

    Keywords: Europe, United Kingdom, PRA, Supervision, Banking, Insurance, Regulatory Arbitrage

    Related Articles
    News

    OCC Revises Minimum Threshold for Banks to Conduct Stress Tests

    OCC issued the final rule that amends its company-run stress testing requirements under the 12 CFR 46 in Code of Federal Regulations.

    October 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Update Management Interlock Rules Under DIMIA

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a final rule that increases the thresholds in the major assets prohibition for management interlocks for purposes of the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act (DIMIA).

    October 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Rules to Closely Match Bank Risk Profiles

    US Agencies (OCC, FED, and FDIC) finalized rules that tailor the regulations for domestic and foreign banks to more closely match their risk profiles.

    October 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CPMI-IOSCO and FSB on Governance Arrangements for OTC Derivatives

    CPMI and IOSCO published a report that identifies key criteria, functions, and bodies for the governance arrangements.

    October 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Launches Field Test on Templates Under 2020 Solvency II Review

    EIOPA, as part of the 2020 Solvency II reporting and disclosure review, launched a field test on the revised and newly proposed reporting templates.

    October 09, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Adopt Rule on Appraisals for Real Estate Transactions

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted the final rule to amend regulations requiring appraisals of real estate for certain transactions

    October 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Amendments to Simplify Volcker Rule

    US Agencies (CFTC, FDIC, FED, OCC, and SEC) finalized amendments to the regulations implementing section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act, also known as the Volcker Rule.

    October 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Report Explores Application and Challenges of Blockchain Technology

    The Joint Research Center of EC published a report exploring the challenges and impact of distributed ledger technologies.

    October 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS and SNB Sign Agreement on Innovation Hub Center in Switzerland

    BIS and SNB signed an operational agreement on the BIS Innovation Hub Center in Switzerland.

    October 08, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Issues Results of Sensitivity Analysis of Liquidity Risk for Banks

    ECB published results of 2019 stress test on sensitivity analysis of liquidity risk.

    October 07, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3958