IMF published its staff report and selected issued report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with Germany. Directors welcomed the progress in implementing the FSAP recommendations. They noted the low profitability in both the bank and life insurance sectors, the elevated macro-financial vulnerabilities, and the rapidly rising real estate prices in dynamic cities. Directors underscored the need to monitor interest rate risk and accelerate restructuring efforts to durably enhance financial sector resilience. They welcomed the activation of the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) and encouraged further steps to address data gaps that would enable a fuller assessment of potential financial stability risks. They also supported expanding the macro-prudential toolkit, including tools for the commercial real estate market.
The staff report highlighted that low profitability continues to weigh on the banking sector, eroding the ability of banks to generate capital organically and putting them at risk in the event of adverse earnings shocks. Large German banks continue to under-perform European peers in market valuation, reflecting high operating costs, outdated IT systems, provisions for compliance violations, and in some cases legacy costs from exposure to the shipping industry. The full adoption of Basel III—especially the introduction of an output floor for internal risk models—is expected to substantially increase German banks’ minimum capital requirement. As of mid-2018, most German life insures’ solvency ratios were well above the 100% threshold set by supervisors, although nearly two-third of them relied on transitional measures and the dispersion was large. The report mentions that supervisors should continue monitoring interest rate risk and press for faster progress in implementing restructuring plans in both banking and insurance sectors.
According to an analysis by Bundesbank, the average tier 1 capital ratio of German banks would be lower by nearly 2 percentage points if they used historical level of risk provisioning. Meanwhile, banks that rely on internal models to calculate regulatory capital have reduced risk-weights and there is evidence of “search for yield” behavior. These trends, alongside rising real estate prices and weak bank profitability, point to a rise in macro-financial vulnerabilities. Given the buildup of macro-financial vulnerabilities, a tightening of macro-prudential policies is appropriate to enhance resilience in the banking system. In May, the Financial Stability Committee recommended to raise the CCyB by 0.25% and banks have 12 months from the beginning of third quarter of 2019 to meet the new requirement. The relatively small increase in the CCyB should have limited impact on credit supply, which is only now recovering after nearly two decades of deleveraging.
The assessment concludes that additional macro-prudential action is needed to guard against imbalances in the real estate sector; these actions could include urgently addressing data gaps, considering prompt activation of the existing borrower-based measures, and expanding the macro-prudential toolkit. The authorities shared the view that risks to financial stability are building up, yet did not see acute systemic risks. Based on the available indicators and information, the authorities saw no substantial increase in risks to financial stability stemming from the flow of new housing loans, which would require an activation of sector-specific demand-side macro-prudential policy tools.
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, Insurance, Article IV, FSAP, CCyB, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, Basel III, Financial Stability, IMF
Previous ArticleIAIS Publishes Global Insurance Market Report for 2018
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.