BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition. The report includes insights on the remaining challenges to transition based on surveys undertaken by FSB, BCBS, and IAIS. In light of the survey results, the report sets out recommendations for authorities to support the progress of financial institutions and their clients in transitioning away from LIBOR. The report highlights that continued reliance of financial markets on LIBOR poses risks to global financial stability. Transition away from LIBOR by the end of 2021 requires significant commitment and sustained effort from both financial and non-financial institutions across many jurisdictions. The report responds to the G20 request to identify challenges to benchmark transition and to explore ways to address them. The report will be delivered to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors ahead of their virtual meeting on July 18, 2020.
The survey results highlight that, compared to FSB jurisdictions, non-FSB jurisdictions are less likely to foresee significant risks in LIBOR transition, mainly due to perceptions of less frequent use of LIBOR in their financial systems. Most FSB jurisdictions have a strategy to address LIBOR transition, as opposed to only half of the surveyed non-FSB jurisdictions. Authorities in LIBOR jurisdictions are relatively more advanced in taking initiatives to facilitate and monitor benchmark transition. Financial institutions in these jurisdictions have shown better progress, although significant challenges remain. In light of the expected cessation of LIBOR after the end of 2021, authorities should strengthen their efforts in facilitating financial and non-financial institutions to transition away from LIBOR. The report includes three sets of recommendations to support LIBOR transition that should generally be applicable to all jurisdictions with LIBOR exposures:
- Identification of transition risks and challenges—Authorities and standard-setting bodies are recommended to issue public statements to promote awareness of LIBOR cessation and associated risks, both within financial institutions and across the financial system. Authorities should evaluate the need and then undertake regular surveys to monitor financial institutions’ exposure to LIBOR and identify possible areas of risk concentration. Supervisory authorities should take follow up actions in light of survey results. Authorities are also recommended to request regular updates from regulated financial institutions on key risks and action plans as well as on steps already taken, including identification of senior management responsible for transition.
- Facilitation of LIBOR transition—Authorities should establish a formal transition strategy supported by adequate resources and industry dialog. Supervisory authorities should consider increasing the intensity of supervisory actions when the preparatory work of individual banks is unsatisfactory.
- Coordination—Authorities are recommended to promote industry-wide coordination, maintain dialog on the adoption of fallback language, consider identifying legislative solutions where necessary, and exchange information on best practices and challenges.
As part of the next steps, FSB, in collaboration with other international bodies and standard-setting bodies, will design a simple set of key metrics or indicators to update the global LIBOR exposures and transition status and will identify a list of qualitative questions to monitor the progress in implementing the above recommendations. The aim is to provide another assessment of the transition progress by early next year. FSB will continue to monitor the evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the ongoing benchmark transition. FSB will incorporate the findings from its monitoring exercise into the annual progress report of FSB on the implementation of recommendations to reform major interest rate benchmarks (a report that is to be published before the G20 Summit in November).
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Interest Rate Benchmark, LIBOR, Risk-Free Rates, IBOR Transition, OTC Derivatives, Basel, BCBS, FSB
Previous ArticleOJK Consults on Rules for Reporting by Commercial Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.