HKMA decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for banks in Hong Kong at 2.5%, in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules (BCR). A review of the indicators of robustness of the system showed that system-wide risks in Hong Kong that are associated with a period of excessive credit growth have not subsided. Housing affordability remains highly stretched and household debt-to-GDP ratio has risen to a new high. Therefore, it is considered appropriate to maintain the CCyB at 2.5% at this juncture, providing additional buffer to shock should systemic risks crystallize.
In reaching the decision to maintain the Hong Kong jurisdictional CCyB rate at 2.5%, HKMA reviewed a range of quantitative indicators and qualitative information. This included the “indicative buffer guide” produced by HKMA’s Initial Reference Calculator (IRC), which is a metric that takes into account conditions in local credit and property markets. By mapping deviations (gaps) of the ratios of credit to GDP and of residential property prices to rentals from their respective long-term trends to the Basel III CCyB range of 0% to 2.5%, the IRC produces a consistent starting point for further analysis. In considering whether there is a build-up of systemic risk, HKMA considers a broad range of information, in addition to the indicative buffer guide produced by the IRC. HKMA also reviewed a series of “Comprehensive Reference Indicators” designed to provide an aggregate view of local conditions, including the build-up of systemic risk (such as measures of bank, household, and corporate leverage; profitability and funding conditions in the banking sector; borrowers’ debt servicing ability; and macroeconomic indicators).
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, CCyB, Basel III, Banking Capital Rules, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, HKMA
Next ArticleEIOPA Publishes Q&A on Regulations in April 2019
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.