The Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (DSIO) at CFTC issued an Advisory clarifying that the uncleared swap margin rules of CFTC do not require documentation governing the posting, collection, and custody of initial margin until the initial margin threshold amount exceeds USD 50 million. This Advisory, which applies only to the covered swap entities, follows the March 2019 statement by BCBS and IOSCO concerning implementation of initial margin.
The DSIO Director Matthew Kulkin said, “The documentation requirements may impose a heavy burden on Phase 5 entities coming into scope in September 2020, and we believe the CFTC staff clarification is appropriate in light of the BCBS-IOSCO March 2019 statement.” The Advisory also clarifies that while no specific initial margin documentation is required prior to reaching the USD 50 million threshold, DSIO expects that CFTC-regulated swap dealers will have appropriate risk management systems in place to calculate and monitor initial margin amounts and will act diligently as the amounts approach the USD 50 million threshold to ensure compliance with the documentation requirements. The CFTC Margin Rule does not require counterparties to the covered swap entities, other than other the covered swap entities, to establish custodial services, document margin relationships, or operationalize the exchange of initial margin. Therefore, this advisory is not applicable to non-swap-dealer counterparties and does not address any obligation of such counterparties or suggest any such obligations.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Swaps, Swap Dealers, Initial Margin, Phase 5 Entities, Margin Requirements, CFTC
Previous ArticleAPRA Decides to Increase Loss-Absorbing Capacity of D-SIBs
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.