HKMA published the frequently asked questions (FAQs) on sale and distribution of debt instruments with loss-absorption features and related products (collectively called “Loss-absorption Products”). The FAQs provide clarification and further guidance to address some enquiries received from the industry. Earlier, in October 2018, HKMA had issued a circular on the sale and distribution of debt instruments with loss-absorption features and related products.
The types of debt instruments that fall within the scope of the October 2018 circular include the following:
- Debt instruments that meet the qualifying criteria to be Additional Tier 1 Capital or Tier 2 Capital under the Banking (Capital) Rules. The same principle applies to debt instruments issued under an equivalent regime of non-Hong Kong jurisdictions (collectively called AT1/T2 debt instruments)
- External loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) debt instruments under the Financial Institutions (Resolution) (Loss-absorbing Capacity Requirements – Banking Sector) Rules and debt instruments issued under a regime of non-Hong Kong jurisdictions, which implements the FSB standards for "total loss-absorbing capacity term sheet.”
Having considered that more time may be needed to further consider the matters clarified in the set of FAQs, HKMA is extending the deadline for:
- Loss-absorption products (except for in-scope collective investment scheme) to September 06, 2019
- In-scope collective investment scheme to December 31, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, Loss-Absorption Products, FAQ, Tier 1 Capital, Tier 2 Capital, TLAC, Resolution, Banking Capital Rules, HKMA
Previous ArticleECB Publishes Risk-Specific Chapters of Guide to Internal Models
Next ArticleEIOPA Appoints Expert Practitioner Panel on PEPP
PRA published a set of questions and answers (Q&A) covering common queries regarding residential and commercial property valuations, for the purpose of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), during the period of disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
IOSCO proposed updates to its principles for regulated entities that outsource tasks to service providers.
MAS announced that the first phase of the Veritas initiative will commence with the development of fairness metrics in credit risk scoring and customer marketing.
BoE published the Statistical Notice 2020/4 to update the buy-to-let (BTL) Phase 2 and Phase 3 definitions for the Interest Rate Type data item.
FSI published a brief note that examines challenges facing the banking sector as a result of the payment deferral programs put in place to support borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
PRA published the policy statement PS14/20, which contains the supervisory statement SS1/20 and the feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP22/19 on expectations for investment by firms in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle, or PPP, as set out in the Investments Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA published an opinion following the notification by the French macro-prudential authority, the Haut Conseil de Stabilité Financière (HCSF), of its intention to extend a measure introduced in 2018 on the use of Article 458(9) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
As part of a Research Bulletin on the recent policy-relevant work, ECB published an article that examines the lessons learned from past crises for nonperforming loan resolution in the post COVID-19 period.
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
ECB updated the guidance notes for reporting related to the statistics on holdings of securities by reporting banking groups (SHSG).