The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published high-level considerations on proportionality. The considerations are intended to provide practical support to supervisory authorities that seek to implement proportionality in their domestic regulatory and supervisory frameworks, in a way that does not undermine the stability or safety of financial institutions.
The document includes high-level considerations to guide decision-making and technical annexes outlining more specific considerations for various elements of the Basel framework. The Basel Consultative Group (BCG) developed these high-level considerations, the application of which will be voluntary and does not modify the core principles for effective banking supervision (BCPs), Basel framework, or any of the Committee's existing standards, guidelines, or sound practices. The Basel Committee does not intend to use these considerations or the accompanying technical annexes to assess proportionality in member or non-member jurisdictions and under the Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program (RCAP). Proportionality in financial system regulation and supervision can ensure that the applicable rules and supervision practices are consistent with the systemic importance and risk profile of banks and are appropriate for the broader characteristics of a particular financial system. To implement proportionality approach across and within jurisdictions, the authorities should consider the following high-level considerations:
- Proportionality approaches should be consistent with the core principles for effective banking supervision to preserve financial stability.
- Basel framework is the standard for internationally active banks and it already embeds a menu of options with various elements of proportionality and flexibility that could be the first choice whenever appropriate and possible.
- The regulation for non-internationally active banks should be customized depending on local circumstances.
- Effective proportionate approaches should be both conservative and simple to understand and implement.
- Proportionality should help authorities achieve an appropriate intensity of supervision for all banks.
- Proportionate approaches should provide regulatory certainty, without being overly static.
- Proportionality approaches should include supervisory discretion that will allow supervisors to respond to bank behaviors and financial system developments.
Keywords: International, Banking, Basel, Proportionality, Systemic Risk, Financial Stability, Basel Core Principles, Basel Consultative Group, BCBS
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements recently published a paper proposing a framework for classifying financial stability regulation as either entity-based or activity-based.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.