The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published high-level considerations on proportionality. The considerations are intended to provide practical support to supervisory authorities that seek to implement proportionality in their domestic regulatory and supervisory frameworks, in a way that does not undermine the stability or safety of financial institutions.
The document includes high-level considerations to guide decision-making and technical annexes outlining more specific considerations for various elements of the Basel framework. The Basel Consultative Group (BCG) developed these high-level considerations, the application of which will be voluntary and does not modify the core principles for effective banking supervision (BCPs), Basel framework, or any of the Committee's existing standards, guidelines, or sound practices. The Basel Committee does not intend to use these considerations or the accompanying technical annexes to assess proportionality in member or non-member jurisdictions and under the Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program (RCAP). Proportionality in financial system regulation and supervision can ensure that the applicable rules and supervision practices are consistent with the systemic importance and risk profile of banks and are appropriate for the broader characteristics of a particular financial system. To implement proportionality approach across and within jurisdictions, the authorities should consider the following high-level considerations:
- Proportionality approaches should be consistent with the core principles for effective banking supervision to preserve financial stability.
- Basel framework is the standard for internationally active banks and it already embeds a menu of options with various elements of proportionality and flexibility that could be the first choice whenever appropriate and possible.
- The regulation for non-internationally active banks should be customized depending on local circumstances.
- Effective proportionate approaches should be both conservative and simple to understand and implement.
- Proportionality should help authorities achieve an appropriate intensity of supervision for all banks.
- Proportionate approaches should provide regulatory certainty, without being overly static.
- Proportionality approaches should include supervisory discretion that will allow supervisors to respond to bank behaviors and financial system developments.
Keywords: International, Banking, Basel, Proportionality, Systemic Risk, Financial Stability, Basel Core Principles, Basel Consultative Group, BCBS
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleUS Agencies Issue Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates
The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched the 2023 European Union (EU)-wide stress test, published annual reports on minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and high earners with data as of December 2021.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed implementing technical standards on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) reporting requirements, with the comment period ending on May 02, 2023.
The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FED) set out details of the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise to be conducted among the six largest U.S. bank holding companies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.
The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.