SRB announced that banks have paid EUR 10.4 billion into the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) for 2021. SRF is made up of contributions from over 3,000 credit institutions and investment firms in the 21 Banking Union countries. SRB also published is annual report, which details work done in 2020 and outlines the scope of future activities. The annual report notes that SRB is on track for the 2024 target of having reached operational resolvability and having Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) fully built up. SRB also published a new set of guidance documents on the implementation of the bail-in tool by banks. The documents include operational guidance on bail-in playbooks and instructions for bail-in data sets, which are accompanied by an explanatory note and a set of questions and answers (Q&A).
The documents on bail-in guidance are not a new set of SRB policies, but they constitute a guide to help banks ensure the required preparation for bail-in application during the resolution planning phase and to fulfil the SRB Expectations for Banks, which is to ensure resolvability. The operational guidance on bail-in playbooks compiles the main elements that banks are expected to consider for developing their bail-in playbooks, to enable the timely and effective execution of the write-down and conversion of capital instruments and eligible liabilities pursuant to Article 21 of the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (SRMR or Regulation 806/20141) and the execution of the bail-in tool in resolution. In a crisis, depending on the specific situation and in line with the applicable legal framework, SRB reserves the right to deviate from actions and expectations of this publication, which is also subject to further revisions, including due to changes in the applicable EU legislation. The operational guidance document outlines the SRB expectations on the content of the playbook and its assessment both on internal and external execution of the bail-in tool. The bail-in playbook is an operational document owned by the bank is expected to address all internal and external actions that must be undertaken by or on behalf of the banks to effectively apply the bail-in tool.
The explanatory note accompanying the operational guidance on bail-in playbooks aims to provide explanation with respect to the data required for the application of the bail-in tool. . It specifies, among others, the minimum expectations concerning liability data that a bank under resolution should provide to resolution authorities in an accurate and timely manner. It also elaborates on the required level of data quality and further considerations that need to be taken into account to ensure sufficient legal certainty while implementing the bail-in tool. The explanatory note includes information concerning the predefined set of bail-in data defined in the document “SRB Bail-in Data Set – Instructions” and should be read in conjunction with related SRB publications on bail-in implementation, such as the Operational Guidance on bail-in playbooks.
- Press Release on SRF
- Press Release on Annual Report
- Notification on Bail-In Implementation
- Guidance on Bail-in Playbooks (PDF)
- Bail-in Data Explanatory Note (PDF)
- Bail-in Data Instructions (PDF)
- Q&A on Bail-in Guidance (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, SRF, Annual Report, Bail In, Resolution Planning, Banking Union, Bail-In Playbook, MREL, Resolution Framework, SRB
Previous ArticlePRA Proposes to Amend Policy on Designating Investment Firms
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.