The CSSF-CPDI (the Council for the Protection of Depositors and Investors) published a circular with the aim to carry out a survey on deposits, particularly on covered deposits, as held by credit institutions incorporated under the Luxembourg law, the POST Luxembourg for its provision of postal financial services, and the Luxembourg branches of credit institutions that have their head office in a third country as at June 30, 2019. The circular has been issued to the members of the Luxembourg deposit guarantee fund (FGDL).
The circular states that the data collection is done on a quarterly basis to identify, throughout the year, trends and changes in indicators relevant to the deposit guarantee. FGDL members are requested to provide data at the level of their legal entity, comprising branches located within other member states, by July 31, 2019. To transmit the data, institutions are being requested to complete the table attached to the circular.
A definition of “covered deposits” and “eligible deposits” can be found in Article 163 of the amended law of December 18, 2015 on the failure of credit institutions and certain investment firms. The circular mentions that persons who are absolutely entitled shall be covered by the guarantee, provided that they have been identified or are identifiable before the guarantee is triggered. Persons are deemed identifiable if the holder of the account has informed the FGDL member institution that holds the deposits, that he acts on behalf of third parties, that he has communicated the number of persons who are absolutely entitled and the amount owed to each of them, and that he is able to provide the institution that holds the deposits or the CPDI with the identity of the persons who are absolutely entitled, upon request of the CPDI in case of the institutions’ failure. To allow the CPDI to follow the use of omnibus or fiduciary accounts and prepare the FGDL for their reimbursement, the volume of eligible and covered deposits in such accounts and the number of persons who are absolutely entitled are to be reported through specific rows in the annexed table.
Related Link: Circular (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, Luxembourg, Banking, Covered Deposits, Deposit Guarantee Fund, Data Collection, FGDL, CPDI, CSSF
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.