EBA Offers Clarification on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime
EBA published an Opinion that provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold (the EUR 30 billion threshold), on which the EBA has currently opened a second public consultation. The Opinion is meant to ease implementation of the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR) and Directive (IFD), which entered into force on June 26, 2021. The opinion provides clarity to both investment firms and their supervisors in the cases in which uncertainty about the relevant classification and the subsequent need for application for an authorization as a credit institution arises in the absence of the technical standards.
The IFR and IFD classify investment firms according to their business model and size, with the size being benchmarked on various thresholds. For a vast majority of investment firms, sufficient clarity already exists with regard to the prudential regime, which applies to them. However, in a few cases, especially for investment firms of third-country groups, the Opinion provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether these investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold. EBA advises competent authorities to apply a pragmatic approach for investment firms in cases where the relevant EUR 30 billion threshold for the identification of the prudential regime to be applied to the investment firm cannot be determined without the guidance provided in the EBA technical standards that are being consulted on. EBA advises supervisors not to prioritize any supervisory or enforcement action in relation to the identification of investments firms, until six months after the final methodology is in place. While EBA cannot provide a proposal for a delegated act with the Opinion, it intends to do so as soon as possible following the ongoing consultation period. EBA requests that EC adopt the technical standards by means of a delegated regulation as quickly as possible after their submission by EBA to provide the necessary legal certainty and resolve the issues highlighted in the Opinion.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Investment Firms, Regulatory Technical Standards, IFD, IFR, Opinion, CRD, Basel, Credit Institutions, Third Country Groups, EBA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
EBA Amends Decision on Unsolicited Credit Assessments by ECAIsRelated Articles
EBA Proposes Standards for IRRBB Reporting Under Basel Framework
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed implementing technical standards on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) reporting requirements, with the comment period ending on May 02, 2023.
FED Issues Further Details on Pilot Climate Scenario Analysis Exercise
The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FED) set out details of the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise to be conducted among the six largest U.S. bank holding companies.
US Agencies Issue Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.
ECB Issues Multiple Reports and Regulatory Updates for Banks
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.
HKMA Keeps List of D-SIBs Unchanged, Makes Other Announcements
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.
EU Issues FAQs on Taxonomy Regulation, Rules Under CRD, FICOD and SFDR
The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.
CBIRC Revises Measures on Corporate Governance Supervision
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.
HKMA Publications Address Sustainability Issues in Financial Sector
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.
EBA Updates Address Basel and NPL Requirements for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.
ESMA Publishes 2022 ESEF XBRL Taxonomy and Conformance Suite
The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.
