EBA Offers Clarification on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime
EBA published an Opinion that provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold (the EUR 30 billion threshold), on which the EBA has currently opened a second public consultation. The Opinion is meant to ease implementation of the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR) and Directive (IFD), which entered into force on June 26, 2021. The opinion provides clarity to both investment firms and their supervisors in the cases in which uncertainty about the relevant classification and the subsequent need for application for an authorization as a credit institution arises in the absence of the technical standards.
The IFR and IFD classify investment firms according to their business model and size, with the size being benchmarked on various thresholds. For a vast majority of investment firms, sufficient clarity already exists with regard to the prudential regime, which applies to them. However, in a few cases, especially for investment firms of third-country groups, the Opinion provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether these investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold. EBA advises competent authorities to apply a pragmatic approach for investment firms in cases where the relevant EUR 30 billion threshold for the identification of the prudential regime to be applied to the investment firm cannot be determined without the guidance provided in the EBA technical standards that are being consulted on. EBA advises supervisors not to prioritize any supervisory or enforcement action in relation to the identification of investments firms, until six months after the final methodology is in place. While EBA cannot provide a proposal for a delegated act with the Opinion, it intends to do so as soon as possible following the ongoing consultation period. EBA requests that EC adopt the technical standards by means of a delegated regulation as quickly as possible after their submission by EBA to provide the necessary legal certainty and resolve the issues highlighted in the Opinion.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Investment Firms, Regulatory Technical Standards, IFD, IFR, Opinion, CRD, Basel, Credit Institutions, Third Country Groups, EBA
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.

Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
EBA Amends Decision on Unsolicited Credit Assessments by ECAIsRelated Articles
EBA Clarifies Use of COVID-19-Impacted Data for IRB Credit Risk Models
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
EP Reaches Agreement on Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
PRA Consults on Model Risk Management Principles for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
EC Regulation Amends Standards for Calculating Credit Risk Adjustments
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
BIS Hub Updates Work Program for 2022, Announces New Projects
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
EIOPA Issues Cyber Underwriting Proposal, Statement on Open Insurance
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
US Senate Members Seek Details on SEC Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
EIOPA Consults on Review of Securitization Framework in Solvency II
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
UK Authorities Issue Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
BCBS Issues Climate Risk Principles while HKMA Expresses Its Support
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.