EBA published an Opinion that provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold (the EUR 30 billion threshold), on which the EBA has currently opened a second public consultation. The Opinion is meant to ease implementation of the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR) and Directive (IFD), which entered into force on June 26, 2021. The opinion provides clarity to both investment firms and their supervisors in the cases in which uncertainty about the relevant classification and the subsequent need for application for an authorization as a credit institution arises in the absence of the technical standards.
The IFR and IFD classify investment firms according to their business model and size, with the size being benchmarked on various thresholds. For a vast majority of investment firms, sufficient clarity already exists with regard to the prudential regime, which applies to them. However, in a few cases, especially for investment firms of third-country groups, the Opinion provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether these investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold. EBA advises competent authorities to apply a pragmatic approach for investment firms in cases where the relevant EUR 30 billion threshold for the identification of the prudential regime to be applied to the investment firm cannot be determined without the guidance provided in the EBA technical standards that are being consulted on. EBA advises supervisors not to prioritize any supervisory or enforcement action in relation to the identification of investments firms, until six months after the final methodology is in place. While EBA cannot provide a proposal for a delegated act with the Opinion, it intends to do so as soon as possible following the ongoing consultation period. EBA requests that EC adopt the technical standards by means of a delegated regulation as quickly as possible after their submission by EBA to provide the necessary legal certainty and resolve the issues highlighted in the Opinion.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Investment Firms, Regulatory Technical Standards, IFD, IFR, Opinion, CRD, Basel, Credit Institutions, Third Country Groups, EBA
Previous ArticleEBA Amends Decision on Unsolicited Credit Assessments by ECAIs
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.