OSFI Updates Rules to Implement Final Basel III Reforms in Canada
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) updated the guidelines on capital adequacy requirements, leverage requirements, liquidity adequacy requirements, capital and liquidity requirements for Small and Medium-Sized Deposit-Taking Institutions (SMSBs), and Pillar 3 disclosure requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and SMSBs. The guidelines on Capital Adequacy Requirements (other than chapters on credit valuation adjustment risk and market risk), leverage requirements, SMSBs, and Pillar 3 will be effective from the second fiscal quarter of 2023 while the revised credit valuation adjustment risk and the market risk chapters of the Capital Adequacy Requirements guideline will be effective from first fiscal quarter of 2024. Additionally, the revised Liquidity Adequacy Requirements Guideline will be implemented as of April 01, 2023. To complement the revised guidelines, OSFI is finalizing corresponding changes to the related regulatory returns, which will be published in February 2022.
The OSFI letter addressed to banking sector entities indicates that the updated rules incorporate the final Basel III banking reforms with additional adjustments to make them suitable for federally regulated deposit-taking institutions. The Annexes to the letter provide non-attributed summaries of the comments received from stakeholders during public consultations on the guidelines in Spring 2021 and an explanation of whether the comments resulted in revisions. The primary changes that have been incorporated in the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline include:
- Clarification of supervisory capital targets for deposit-taking institutions, including interactions with capital buffers (Chapter 1)
- Implementation of a 72.5% Basel III output floor to be phased in over three years commencing in second fiscal quarter of 2023 (Chapter 1)
- Introduction of new deductions from common equity tier 1 capital for certain exposures formerly subject to a 1250% risk-weight, and reverse mortgages with loan-to-value ratios greater than 80% (Chapter 2)
- Introduction of new operational risk capital rules through the domestic implementation of the Basel III standardized approach for operational risk and a new simplified standardized approach available for SMSBs (Chapter 3)
- Maintenance of the current capital treatment for general residential real estate exposures with loan-to-value ratios between 70% and 80% (Chapter 4)
- Reduction of credit risk capital requirements for certain qualifying revolving retail exposures, incorporation of updates to the capital treatment of privately insured mortgages, and introduction of a capital treatment for residential real estate exposures that do not meet expectations of OSFI related to Guideline B-20 on residential mortgage underwriting practices and procedures (Chapters 4 and 5)
- Elimination of the 1.06 internal ratings-based scaling factor initially implemented as part of the transition from Basel I to Basel II (Chapter 5)
- Implementation of the revised market risk capital rules, consistent with the fundamental review of the trading book of Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, as well as the revised credit valuation adjustment, or CVA, framework (Chapters 8 and 9)
Below are the key updates with respect to the other guidelines:
- Leverage Requirements Guideline. Application of a leverage ratio buffer to D-SIBs; changes to the leverage requirements (for example, the treatment of securities financing transactions and the treatment of off-balance sheet items) to align with revisions to the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline
- Liquidity Adequacy Requirements Guideline. Enhancements to Net Cumulative Cash Flow (NCCF) requirements to improve the recognition of cash flows related to asset growth (Chapter 4); reduction of the time to report NCCF to OSFI for non-D-SIBs and clarifications of the time to report NCCF to OSFI for all institutions during periods of stress
- SMSBs Capital and Liquidity Requirements Guideline. Key features of this new guideline include criteria to segment SMSBs into different categories for the purposes of determining capital and liquidity requirements; separate sections for each category of SMSBs that describe the applicable capital and liquidity requirements and references to the relevant sections of the Capital Adequacy Requirements, Leverage Requirements, and Liquidity Adequacy Requirements Guidelines
- Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements Guideline. Issuance of separate Pillar 3 Disclosure Guidelines for D-SIBs and SMSBs; incorporation of the complete set of disclosures from the Basel Framework for D-SIBs; and clearer and more proportional disclosure requirements for SMSBs
Related Links
- Press Release
- Letter
- Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline
- Leverage Requirements Guideline
- Liquidity Adequacy Requirements Guideline
- SMSBs Capital and Liquidity Requirements Guideline
- Pillar 3 Disclosure Guideline for D-SIBs
- Pillar 3 Disclosure Guideline for SMSBs
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Pillar 3, Output Floor, CVA Risk, Disclosures, Reporting, SMSBs, Headline, FRTB, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Related Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
