FED is adopting a final rule to revise its regulations related to determinations of whether a company has the ability to exercise a controlling influence over another company for purposes of the Bank Holding Company Act or the Home Owners’ Loan Act. The final rule includes certain targeted adjustments to the historical practice of FED. The final rule will be effective from April 01, 2020. FED also published a chart that shows how different combinations of the factors would or would not result in control. In a statement supporting this rule, the FED Governor Lael Brainard said that the rule substantially increases the transparency and clarity of the control framework.
FED had proposed this rule in April last year and this final rule is largely consistent with the proposal, though FED has made certain changes to the proposed rule. The rule establishes a comprehensive and public framework to determine when a company controls a bank or a bank controls a company. The framework uses several factors to determine if a company has control over a bank. The key factors include the company's total voting and non-voting equity investment in the bank; director, officer, and employee overlaps between the company and the bank; and the scope of business relationships between the company and the bank. The final rule should help to facilitate permissible investments in banking organizations and by banking organizations.
As indicated in the proposal, the final rule contains certain targeted adjustments from the current practice in light of FED's experience administering the statute. These changes are generally technical in nature rather than fundamental changes to FED's substantive standards for controlling influence. As the final rule is generally consistent with current practice, significant changes in outcomes are not anticipated and, therefore, no major impact on the banking industry is expected. Importantly, the final rule significantly improves the transparency and predictability around questions of controlling influence. Under the final rule, a company would be presumed to control another company when:
- The first company controls 5% or more of any class of voting securities of the second company and has business relationships with the second company that generate in the aggregate 10% or more of the total annual revenues or expenses of the second company
- The first company controls 10% or more of any class of voting securities of the second company and has business relationships with the second company that generate in the aggregate 5% or more of the total annual revenues or expenses of the second company
- The first company controls 15% or more of any class of voting securities of the second company and has business relationships with the second company that generate in the aggregate 2% or more of the total annual revenues or expenses of the second company
Effective Date: April 01, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Control of Banking Organization, Regulation Y, Regulation ll, FED
Previous ArticleEC Updates List of Appropriately Diversified Stock Indices Under CRR
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The EBA Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to ten questions.
ESMA updated the set of questions and answers (Q&A), along with the reporting instructions and an XML schema for the templates set out in the technical standards on disclosure requirements, under the Securitization Regulation.
EU published Regulation 2021/337, which amends the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC), regarding the use of the single electronic reporting format for annual financial reports.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.