FCA Response to ISDA on Reasonable Period for Non-Representative LIBOR
FCA issued a letter to ISDA in response to an ISDA letter to FSB. In this letter, ISDA had asked whether FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA) can give further clarity about the length of any “reasonable period” in which a non-representative LIBOR might be published prior to the final cessation of LIBOR. The FCA letter sets out its response to describe the laws relevant in this situation and provides clarity on how FCA intends to apply these laws. IBA also responded to the ISDA letter and has announced a rulebook consultation process regarding the inclusion of an automatic trigger.
The FCA letter sets out why market participants should not assume that any period of non-representative LIBOR based on reduced panel bank submissions would last for more than a short period. The law governing critical benchmarks such as LIBOR is set out in the EU Benchmarks Regulation. Notwithstanding the preference for an orderly cessation, planned in advance, the mechanics of the Benchmarks Regulation mean that the publication of a non-representative LIBOR cannot be ruled out, at least for a period of time. EU-supervised firms could potentially be prohibited from entering into new LIBOR transactions, and even from continuing to use LIBOR in existing transactions in some circumstances, under the Benchmarks Regulation.
FCA has made clear that it sees no way of changing LIBOR to make it representative again after the panel bank departures have rendered it non-representative. Consequently, the only way FCA sees this provision operating in practice is that the administrator must cease the rate within a reasonable time period. Moreover, a non-representative panel bank LIBOR could continue only for such time as a minimum number of panel banks were prepared to continue contributing to the benchmark such that IBA’s Reduced Submissions Policy did not apply. FCA has made clear that it has no plans to compel panel banks to contribute once the existing voluntary agreement with them expires. Consistent with having no plans to compel panel banks to contribute after 2021, assuming insufficient willing voluntary contributors, FCA would not expect to compel IBA to continue to produce a non-representative panel bank LIBOR.
FCA would not seek to prolong a non-representative panel bank LIBOR simply to benefit firms which had failed, or continued to fail, to act on opportunities to transition. Where contracts can practicably be amended to reference alternative rates by bilateral agreement or other arrangements, they should be, before end-2021. EU supervised firms are required by the Benchmarks Regulation to have appropriate plans in the event that a benchmark materially changes or ceases to be provided. Firms can meet this requirement by having pre-cessation triggers included in LIBOR contracts that cannot be proactively transitioned away from the rate. FCA recognizes that there are some LIBOR-referencing contracts that it is not practicable to change and a task force under the Sterling Risk Free Rate Working Group has been dedicated to the topic of "tough legacy."
Related Links
Keywords: International, Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, IBOR, Pre-Cessation Triggers, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Benchmarks Regulation, FSB, FCA, ISDA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Dieter Van der Stock
IFRS subject matter expert; LDTI subject matter expert; accounting authority; risk management specialist
Related Articles
EBA Finalizes Templates for One-Off Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
EBA Mulls Inclusion of Environmental & Social Risks to Pillar 1 Rules
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently published a report that recommends enhancements to the Pillar 1 framework, under the prudential rules, to capture environmental and social risks.
BCBS Consults on Disclosure of Crypto-Asset Exposures of Banks
As a follow on from its prudential standard on the treatment of crypto-asset exposures, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) proposed disclosure requirements for crypto-asset exposures of banks.
BCBS and EBA Publish Results of Basel III Monitoring Exercise
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise.
PRA Updates Timeline for Final Basel III Rules, Issues Other Updates
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) recently issued a few regulatory updates for banks, with the updated Basel implementation timelines being the key among them.
US Treasury Sets Out Principles for Net-Zero Financing
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has recently set out the principles for net-zero financing and investment.
EC Launches Survey on G7 Principles on Generative AI
The European Commission (EC) launched a stakeholder survey on the draft International Guiding Principles for organizations developing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
