January 30, 2018

The U.S. GAO published an annual report examining the extent to which, and how, financial regulators performed the required Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analyses and established policies and procedures for complying with the RFA requirements, among other objectives. GAO reviewed the RFA section of financial regulators’ Federal Register notices of rule making, related internal work papers, and policies and procedures for conducting RFA analyses. GAO also determined the extent to which regulators’ analyses reflected RFA requirements, guidance issued by the Office of Advocacy, and OMB guidance on regulatory analysis.

To comply with the RFA, agencies must assess the rule’s potential impact on small entities and consider alternatives that may minimize any significant economic impact of the rule. Alternatively, agencies may certify that a rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. GAO found several weaknesses with the analyses of six financial regulators—FED, OCC, FDIC, SEC, CFTC, and CFPB—that could undermine the goal of RFA and limit transparency and public accountability, as shown in the following examples:

  • Certifications. In certifications for rules that regulators determined may affect small entities, regulators conducted analyses to support their conclusions. GAO found that, in general, analyses across all regulators lacked key information the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy and the OMB recommend. Missing information included discussions of data sources or methodologies, consideration of broader economic impact of the rule making, and definitions of the criteria regulators used for substantial number and significant economic impact.
  • Regulatory flexibility analyses. In many of the initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses that GAO reviewed, financial regulators’ evaluation of key components required by RFA—potential economic effects and alternative regulatory approaches—was limited. Most regulators (five of six) did not disclose data sources or methodologies used for their analyses, as OMB recommends. For most rules that GAO reviewed, regulators (five of six) were unable to provide documentation supporting their regulatory flexibility analyses, as OMB recommends, including analyses supporting certification decisions. However, the extent of documentation varied by regulator.

Federal internal control standards state the importance for agency management to establish policies and procedures to achieve objectives. All but one of the financial regulators have guidelines that restate RFA requirements for certification and for preparing regulatory flexibility analyses and provide some information on how to approach these analyses. However, these regulators generally have not developed specific policies and procedures to assist staff in complying with RFA, which may contribute to the weaknesses GAO identified in the analyses. By not developing and implementing comprehensive policies and procedures for RFA analyses, regulators’ ability to consistently and effectively meet RFA objectives may be limited. GAO is making 10 recommendations among the six financial regulators reviewed, including that regulators develop and implement specific policies and procedures for consistently complying with RFA requirements and related guidance for conducting RFA analyses. Five agencies generally agreed with the recommendations and one did not provide written comments.

 

Related Link: Press Release

Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Regulatory Flexibility Act, Regulatory Flexibility Analyses, GAO

Related Articles
News

FSB Chair Reports to G20 on Implementation of Financial Reforms

FSB published the letter to G20 Leaders and the opening statement from an FSB briefing by the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles.

June 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Summarizes Progress in Implementation of G20 Regulatory Reforms

FSB published a summary progress report on implementation of the G20 financial regulatory reforms.

June 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Issues 2020 Stress Test Methodology and Templates for Discussion

EBA published the 2020 EU-wide stress test draft methodology, templates, and template guidance, for discussion with the industry.

June 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SRB Updates MREL Policy to Reflect Changes in CRR 2

SRB updated its policy on minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) as a result of the revisions in the recent Banking Package.

June 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Updates Manual of Reporting Forms and Instructions for Insurers

OSFI issued its annual update for 2019 to the manual of financial reporting forms and instructions for property and casualty (P&C) insurance companies.

June 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Consults on PRA110 Reporting Frequency Threshold

PRA proposed (CP14/19) to amend the reporting frequency of PRA110 reporting template (PRA110) when a firm is in stress.

June 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Updates Guidance on Managing Information Security Risks

APRA released an updated Prudential Practice Guide CPG 234 on managing information security risks, including cyber-crime.

June 25, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IMF Releases Report on 2019 Article IV Consultation with United States

IMF published its staff report in the context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with the United States.

June 24, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FCA and US Agencies on Addressing Issues in Credit Derivatives Market

U.S. SEC Chairman Jay Clayton, U.S. CFTC Chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo, and UK FCA Chief Executive Andrew Bailey issued a joint statement announcing plans to address concerns regarding opportunistic strategies in the credit derivatives markets.

June 24, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BIS Report Discusses Regulatory Issues Related to Big Techs in Finance

BIS has pre-released a chapter of the BIS Annual Economic Report; this chapter focuses on the risks and opportunities presented by large technology firms in the financial services sector.

June 23, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3315