APRA Papers Examine Measures on CCyB and Mortgage Lending Standards
APRA published information papers on the indicators that contributed to the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) decision and on the review of the prudential measures for residential mortgage lending risks. APRA also announced its decision to keep the CCyB for authorized deposit-taking institutions on hold at zero percent. APRA reviews the buffer quarterly and it has been set at zero percent of risk-weighted assets since it was introduced in 2016.
In the annual information paper on CCyB, APRA outlined the core economic indicators that contributed to the decision, including the following:
- Moderate growth in housing and business credit over 2018
- A decline in higher-risk categories of new housing lending, including interest-only loans, investor loans, and lending at high loan-to-value ratio (LVR) levels
- Continued strengthening in authorized deposit-taking institutions’ capital positions as they move to implement the requirements of “unquestionably strong” capital ratios
Also influencing APRA’s judgment that a zero percent CCyB setting remained appropriate has been the impact of measures that APRA has taken since 2014 to address systemic risks related to residential mortgage lending standards. In a separate but related information paper, APRA detailed the objectives for its interventions in the residential mortgage lending market in recent years, which were aimed at reinforcing sound mortgage lending standards and increasing the resilience of the banking sector in the face of heightened risks. The following are the key findings in the paper:
- Authorized deposit-taking institutions have lifted the quality of their lending standards, with improvements in policies and practices across the industry.
- During the period in which the adjustments were occurring (2015-2018), the growth in total credit for housing was stable.
- The composition of credit for housing, however, changed notably: the rate of growth of lending to investors fell considerably and the proportion of loans written on an interest only basis roughly halved (although, given the high starting point, one in five loans is still made on an interest-only basis).
- Although APRA did not introduce measures to specifically target lending with high LVR, there has been a moderation in high LVR lending in recent years.
- Initially, authorized deposit-taking institutions sought to adjust lending practices without resorting to interest rate increases. Ultimately, however, interest rates were used to help manage demand for credit. The pricing differential that has emerged between owner-occupied and investor loans, and between amortizing and interest-only loans, is often seen to be a product of the APRA benchmarks, but is also reflective of changes to capital requirements that will likely see differential pricing for higher risk lending continue into the future.
In conjunction with the other agencies on the Council of Financial Regulators, APRA will continue to closely monitor economic conditions and will adjust the CCyB if future circumstances warrant it. Separately, APRA is also considering setting the buffer at a non-zero default rate as part of its ongoing review of the authorized deposit-taking institutions capital framework.
Related Links
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, CCyB, Residential Mortgage Lending, Systemic Risk, LVR, APRA
Previous Article
CPMI-IOSCO Conclude that Switzerland has Generally Implemented PFMIRelated Articles
|
News
US Agencies Consult on Capital Treatment of Land Development LoansUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) issued a proposed rule on the treatment of loans that finance the development of land for purposes of the one- to four-family residential properties exclusion in the definition of high volatility commercial real estate (HVCRE) exposure in the regulatory capital rule.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for July 2019Under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week, EBA published answers to five questions related to supervisory reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ESMA Updates Manual for European Single Electronic Format in EUESMA updated the reporting manual for European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Updates Supplemental Instructions for Reporting Form FR Y-9CFED updated the supplemental instructions for FR Y-9C reporting.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Publishes Report on Monitoring Implementation of LCR in EUEBA published its first report on the monitoring of the implementation of liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) in EU.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EIOPA Consults on Reporting and Disclosures Under Solvency II ReviewEIOPA launched a consultation package on supervisory reporting and public disclosure in the context of its work linked with the 2020 Solvency II review.
July 12, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Applies Additional Capital Requirements to Three Australian BanksAPRA is applying additional capital requirements to three major banks in Australia to reflect higher operational risk identified in their risk governance self-assessments.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
IMF Report on 2019 Article IV Consultation on Euro Area PoliciesIMF published its staff report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation on euro area policies with member countries.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FSB to Survey Practices on Cyber Incident Response and RecoveryFSB launched a survey on the industry practices on cyber incident response and recovery.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Appoints New Members of Supervisory BoardThe Governing Council of ECB appointed Edouard Fernandez-Bollo, Kerstin af Jochnick, and Elizabeth McCaul as representatives to the Supervisory Board of ECB Banking Supervision, for a five-year non-renewable term.
July 11, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
