The Green Finance Industry Taskforce (GFIT or the Taskforce) of MAS proposed the taxonomy for Singapore-based financial institutions to identify and classify activities that can be considered green or transitioning toward green. The comment period on this consultation will end on March 11, 2021. The Taskforce also launched a handbook on implementing environmental risk management for asset managers, banks, and insurers. In addition, the Taskforce is exploring technology solutions for financial institutions to enhance the quality of their climate-related disclosures. The Taskforce aims to pilot innovations that seek to solve the challenges in mobilizing green finance across sectors. These resources will complement the taxonomy and handbook.
Consultation on green and transition taxonomy
The consultation seeks feedback on the Taskforce's recommendations on the environmental objectives, focus sectors, and a “traffic-light” system, which sets out how activities can be classified as green, yellow (transition), or red according to their level of alignment with environmental objectives. The consultation discusses the merits of a taxonomy for Singapore-based financial institutions, with particular relevance to those active across ASEAN, sets out a basic approach to a taxonomy, identifies economic sectors important to Singapore and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and that would particularly benefit from such classification, and poses follow-up questions. The consultation provides an introduction to the directional design of a taxonomy. It discusses the environmental objectives of the taxonomy, the sectors that may be covered, the economic activities within those sectors, and the general approach to classification.
The key purpose of developing a green taxonomy for Singapore-based financial institutions is to encourage the flow of capital to support the low-carbon transition needed to avoid catastrophic climate change and to support the environmental objectives of Singapore and the ASEAN nations, which are serviced by Singapore-based financial institutions. Compared to other taxonomies, a key feature of the proposed taxonomy is that it encompasses transition activities that allow for a progressive shift toward greater sustainability while taking into account starting positions and supporting inclusive economic and social development. The taxonomy references international best practices and adapts them to the Asian context where relevant. The Green Finance Industry Taskforce will develop, in its next phase of work, a combination of principle-based criteria and quantifiable thresholds for activities. This will provide clarity and ease the implementation of the taxonomy by financial institutions.
Handbook on implementing environmental risk management
The handbook on implementation of environmental risk management outlines the financial risks arising from environmental risks, the various transmission channels, and the need for a green taxonomy to help financial institutions play a key role in directing capital flows toward sustainable economic activities. The handbook also focuses on effective integration and implementation of environmental risks into the governance framework for financial institutions. Good practices in environmental risk governance include board accountability and oversight, clear delineation of roles and responsibilities for senior management, integration of environmental risk into risk frameworks and policies, board approved risk appetite, and reporting metrics and capacity building. The handbook outlines the steps that financial institutions can take to embed environmental and climate-related financial risk into their risk management processes, make informed decisions, and improve their resilience. The handbook also showcases case studies of effective environmental and climate-related financial disclosures. Effective disclosures allow financial institutions to provide greater transparency on the impact of financially material environmental risks on their business.
Comment Due Date: March 11, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Climate-Related Disclosures, Disclosures, Reporting, GFIT, Sustainable Finance, Sustainable Taxonomy, MAS
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleHKMA Keeps Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 1%
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a joint report that outlines the initial findings from climate scenario analyses undertaken by financial authorities to assess climate-related financial risks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 leaders, highlighting the work that it will undertake under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023 to strengthen resilience of the financial system.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The European Union has finalized and published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a set of 13 Delegated and Implementing Regulations applicable to the European crowdfunding service providers.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.