ECB Sets Out Results of Supervisory Review and Priorities for 2021
ECB published outcome of the 2020 Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) and announced the supervisory priorities for 2021. The results suggest that coordinated policy measures, including extraordinary supervisory measures, provided considerable protection to households, businesses, and banking sector, helping to avert excessive procyclicality from the pandemic-induced shock. However, significant uncertainties remain in the short to medium term, with the main findings identified during the 2020 SREP being in the areas of credit risk, capital adequacy, business model sustainability, and internal governance. In turn, the supervisory priorities for 2021 draw on this assessment of the key risks and vulnerabilities in the banking sector, with the four key priority areas for 2021 being credit risk management, capital strength, business model sustainability, and internal governance.
The SREP results for 2020 reflect an early decision by ECB to take a pragmatic approach toward conducting its annual core activities on account of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pragmatic approach to the SREP focused on banks’ ability to address the challenges and risks to capital and liquidity arising from the ongoing pandemic. The main findings identified during the2020 SREP concerned credit risk, capital adequacy, business model sustainability, and internal governance. These findings were addressed through qualitative recommendations:
- The phasing-out of several COVID-related support measures in 2021 may increase the risk of cliff effects. To encourage appropriately prudent approaches, supervisors have communicated a considerably higher number of recommendations to banks.
- Some banks were slow to address pandemic-related governance challenges. Supervisors found, in some cases, that there was a lack of adequate involvement by the management body, with insufficient follow-up and oversight of business functions, particularly in relation to reporting adequacy. Furthermore, there were also issues regarding credit risk management within the internal control functions and sustained structural weaknesses in the area of risk data aggregation and reporting.
- Supervisors expressed concerns about the reliability of business plans for some banks and addressed these through qualitative recommendations to improve profitability. Banks have responded to such challenges by pursuing broader strategic overhauls or restructuring plans as well as domestic consolidation operations. Supervisors have been encouraging banks to pursue these strategic overhauls and improve efficiency and are closely monitoring the implementation of strategic actions of banks.
- Supervisors expressed concerns about the reliability of capital planning frameworks of banks. Banks with with a small margin between their capital ratio and minimum requirements were subject to recommendations to enhance their capital planning. As part of the ECB’s relief measures, banks may fully use capital buffers, including Pillar 2 guidance, until at least the end of 2022. Overall, nine banks are making use of these measures, with common equity tier 1 levels based on the third quarter of 2020 being below the common equity tier 1 requirements and guidance prior to the COVID-19 measures.
In addition to the four key priority areas, ECB will carry out supervisory activities to address other medium and longer-term structural risks to European banks, beyond the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. Supervisors will focus on the alignment of banks with expectations set out in the ECB guide on climate-related and environmental risks, prudential risks emanating from money laundering, cyber and digitalization risks, and banks' preparedness for the final stages of the implementation of Basel III. Depending on how the crisis develops, the supervisory activities may be adjusted and tailored according to the specific risk profiles of banks. Some of the supervisory priorities of the ECB Banking Supervision,, for 2021, are as follows:
- Supervisors will focus on the adequacy of banks’ credit risk measurement and management, to foster timely identification, efficient monitoring, and the mitigation of procyclicality.
- The EBA-coordinated EU-wide stress test will be an important element in gauging capital resilience of banks, in addition to the continued supervisory review of capital planning by banks.
- Strategic plans and the underlying measures taken by banks to overcome existing structural deficiencies will continue to be challenged.
- Supervisory focus will remain on the adequacy of banks’ crisis risk management frameworks, risk data aggregation, IT and cyber risks, and anti-money laundering risks.
- Press Release
- SREP Results
- Supervisory Priorities
- Assessment of Risks and Vulnerabilities
- Supervisory Methodology
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, SREP, Basel, SSM, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, Pillar 2, ESG, COVID-19, CRD5, Governance, Climate Change Risk, Stress Testing, ECB
Credit analytics expert helping clients understand, develop, and implement credit models for origination, monitoring, and regulatory reporting.
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous ArticleEC Approves Prolongation of Danish Resolution Scheme for Small Banks
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.