OSFI Outlines Capital Treatment for COVID-19 Loan Guarantee Program
OSFI issued a letter to federally regulated deposit-taking institutions on the capital treatment of new loans to businesses through the Highly Affected Sectors Credit Availability Program (HASCAP). The government of Canada mandated the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) to set up the HASCAP loan guarantee program and work with eligible lenders to provide additional liquidity for Canadian businesses highly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. OSFI expects federally regulated lenders to treat HASCAP loans as a sovereign exposure based on the BDC guarantee and to apply the relevant risk-weight under the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline of OSFI.
The OSFI letter is addressed to banks, bank holding companies, and federally regulated trust and loan companies. The letter specifies the following key points:
- The BDC guarantee can be recognized as a guarantee under the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline, as it meets the related operational requirements set out in paragraphs 75 and 76 of Chapter 5 of the Guideline.
- If there are currency or maturity mismatches, the amount of the guarantee recognized for capital purposes would need to be adjusted according to section 5.1.6 of the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline.
- Under the Standardized Approach to credit risk, the guaranteed loan would receive the risk-weight applicable to the government of Canada (0%), the guarantor.
- Under the Internal Ratings Based Approach to credit risk, the guaranteed loan would be treated with the Probability of Default substitution approach and/or the Loss Given Default adjustment approach as outlined in section 6.8.7 (ix) of the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline.
- In calculating the leverage ratio, the entire amount of the loan would need to be included in the exposure measure of the leverage ratio pursuant to the Leverage Requirements Guideline paragraph 12.
By announcing the capital treatment of this loan program, OSFI is providing timely direction for institutions, financial markets, and borrowers. These and other responsive regulatory adjustments, in addition to the ongoing supervisory vigilance, ensure that the OSFI guidance is appropriate for these extraordinary circumstances while remaining risk-focused and forward‑looking. OSFI will continue to look for ways to ensure its capital and liquidity requirements are fit for purpose during the pandemic.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, COVID-19, Regulatory Capital, CAR Guideline Leverage Requirements Guideline, Basel, Guarantee Scheme, Loan Guarantee, Credit Risk, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
HKMA Announces Success of Green Bond Offering from HKSARRelated Articles
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
DNB Publishes Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
DNB, the central bank of Netherlands, updated the list of additional reporting requests and published additional data quality checks and XBRL-Formula linkbase documents for the first quarter of 2023.
NBB Sets Out Climate Risk Expectations, Issues Reporting Updates
The National Bank of Belgium (NBB) published a communication on climate-related and environmental risks, issued an update on XBRL reporting
EBA Updates Address Securitization Standards and DGS Guidelines
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft of the regulatory technical standards that set out conditions for assessment of homogeneity of the underlying exposures in simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) securitizations.
FSB Publishes Letter to G20, Sets Out Work Priorities for 2023
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, highlighting the work that FSB will take forward under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023
