EU Council Adopts Position on Artificial Intelligence & AML/CFT Rules
The European Council adopted its position, or the general approach, on the proposals on Artificial Intelligence Act and the new Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6) and Regulation. The new anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) rules will be extended to the entire crypto sector, obliging all crypto-asset service providers to conduct due diligence on their customers. Additionally, the European Council adopted a directive on the resilience of critical entities, along with a recommendation on the resilience of critical infrastructure.
The proposal on Artificial Intelligence Act aims to ensure that artificial intelligence systems placed on the European Union (EU) market and used in EU are safe and respect existing law. The proposal follows a risk-based approach and lays down a uniform, horizontal legal framework for artificial intelligence that aims to ensure legal certainty. It promotes investment and innovation in artificial intelligence, enhances governance and effective enforcement of existing law on fundamental rights and safety, and facilitates the development of a single market for artificial intelligence applications. The main elements of the proposal include definition of an artificial intelligence system, prohibited artificial intelligence practices, classification and requirements for high-risk artificial intelligence systems and responsibilities of various actors in the artificial intelligence value chain, general purpose artificial intelligence system, scope and provisions relating to law enforcement authorities, compliance framework for the artificial intelligence act, transparency and other provisions in favor of the affected person, as well as measures in support of innovation. As a next step, the adoption of the general approach will allow the European Council to enter negotiations with the European Parliament, once the latter adopts its own position with a view to reaching an agreement on the proposed regulation.
The Directive on the resilience of critical entities establishes rules on the supervision and enforcement of critical entities and for the identification of critical entities of particular European significance. The Directive expects member states to have a national strategy to enhance the resilience of critical entities, carry out a risk assessment at least every four years, and identify the critical entities that provide essential services. Critical entities will need to identify the relevant risks that may significantly disrupt the provision of essential services, take appropriate measures to ensure their resilience, and notify disruptive incidents to the competent authorities. This Directive will repeal Directive2008/114/EC, with effect from October 18, 2024. The Council also adopted a recommendation on an EU-wide coordinated approach to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure that sets out a series of targeted actions at the EU and national levels to support and enhance the resilience of critical infrastructure, on a voluntary basis, with a focus on critical infrastructure with significant cross-border relevance.
- Press Release on Artificial Intelligence Act
- General Approach on Artificial Intelligence Act (PDF)
- Press Release on AML/CFT Rules
- Regulation on AML/CFT Rules (PDF)
- Directive on AML/CFT Rules (PDF)
- Press Release on Resilience of Critical Entities
- Directive on Resilience of Critical Entities
- Recommendation on Resilience of Critical Infrastructure
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Regtech, AML CFT, Artificial Intelligence Act, Artificial Intelligence, Crypto-Assets, Cyber Risk, Crypto-Asset Service Providers, Critical Infrastructure, Cross-Border Activities, European Council
Previous ArticleBNM Proposes Standardized Approach for Credit Risk Under Basel Rules
Next ArticleCBB Amends Credit Risk Management Module for Banks
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.