ESRB Responds to EIOPA Consultation on 2020 Review of Solvency II
ESRB published its response to the EIOPA consultation paper on review of Solvency II. ESRB highlighted that, although Solvency II has helped strengthen safety of individual insurers and EIOPA has been central to making the new regime a success, certain gaps exist in the current framework. ESRB points out that it welcomes the review and the consultation of EIOPA the ongoing review of Solvency II, which is a unique opportunity to close the existing gaps in the years to come. The EIOPA consultation covers topics such as long-term guarantee measures, measures on equity risk, technical provisions, own funds, standard formula for solvency capital requirement, calculation of minimum capital requirement, reporting and disclosures, proportionality, group supervision, macro-prudential policy, and recovery and resolution.
The proposals set out in the response to the consultation paper by EIOPA reflect the positions that ESRB has taken over the past few years. These proposals have been grouped under three broad headings, which reflect the topics that ESRB considers most pertinent with regard to their systemic impact:
- Better reflect macro-prudential considerations in Solvency II. The response letter discusses enhancement of the macro-prudential dimension of Solvency II and extension of the recovery period under Article 138 of Solvency II. The section on enhancing the macro-prudential dimension of Solvency II sets out the solvency, liquidity, and horizontal tools proposed by ESRB to reflect the macro-prudential considerations that have been identified in a report approved by the ESRB General Board in 2019 as necessary to enhance Solvency II.
- Establish harmonized recovery and resolution framework across EU. ESRB agrees with the draft advice by EIOPA on the need for a harmonized recovery and resolution framework across EU. The ESRB General Board considered recovery and resolution of the insurance sector and published its views in a report in 2017. This report concludes in favor of a harmonized effective recovery and resolution framework for insurers and sets out points that such a framework should include.
- Continue to ensure that risks are properly captured under Solvency II. EIOPA consultation paper considers options for the calculation of risk-free interest rate term structure. ESRB welcomes the analysis by EIOPA, as it sees the need to adjust the risk-free interest rate term structure to better meet macro-prudential considerations. ESRB considers it important that the resilience of the insurance sector to property risks is not weakened at the current juncture. ESRB identified vulnerabilities in both commercial real estate and residential real estate that should be considered in any recalibration of property risk.
In addition, ESRB welcomes that EIOPA is giving ample consideration to the principle of proportionality in its consultation paper. Some of the proposals set out in the response interact with those made in the EIOPA consultation paper. To better understand this interaction and to support the further calibration of the tools, it would be important for EIOPA to consider these proposals in its impact assessment. This is particularly relevant for the symmetric volatility adjustment, which can be integrated into the own proposals of EIOPA for this measure.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Solvency II Review, Recovery and Resolution, Macro-prudential Tools, Proportionality, Reporting, SCR, Response to Consultation, EIOPA, ESRB
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Pierre-Etienne Chabanel
Brings expertise in technology and software solutions around banking regulation, whether deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Related Articles
EBA Provides Clarity on Implementation of Certain COVID-19 Policies
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
BCBS Report Examines Progress on Adoption of Basel III Framework
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
BCBS Amends Guidelines on Sound Management of AML/CFT Risks
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).
US Agencies Finalize Amendments to Swap Margin Rule
US Agencies (Farm Credit Administration, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) finalized changes to the swap margin rule to facilitate implementation of prudent risk management strategies at banks and other entities with significant swap activities.
PRA Letter Sets Expectations on Approach to Managing Climate Risks
PRA published a letter that builds on the expectations set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/19) on enhancing banks' and insurers' approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change.
EBA Guidelines on Treatment of Structural Foreign Exchange Under CRR
EBA finalized the guidelines on treatment of structural foreign-exchange (FX) positions under Article 352(2) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
FSB Issues Statement on Impact of COVID-19 Crisis on Benchmark Reform
FSB published a statement on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global benchmark transition.
IAIS Publishes List of Internationally Active Insurance Groups
IAIS published the list of Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs) publicly disclosed by group-wide supervisors.
FED Temporarily Revises FR Y-9C With Respect to PPPLF and CARES Act
FED has temporarily revised the reporting form on consolidated financial statements for holding companies (FR Y-9C; OMB No. 7100-0128).
EC Launches Consultation on Review of Solvency II Directive
EC launched a consultation on the review of the key elements of Solvency II Directive, with the comment period ending on October 21, 2020.
