MFSA Circular on Treatment and Reporting of Loan Moratoria
MFSA published a circular for credit institutions on the treatment and reporting of moratoria on loan repayments applied in light of the COVID-19 crisis. The circular aims to provide clarifications about application of the EBA guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments amid the COVID-19 crisis (EBA/GL/2020/02) and as further amended by EBA/GL/2020/08 and by EBA/GL/2020/15. In addition, MFSA updated the guidelines to the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) IV supervisory reporting requirements for credit institutions, along with the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements for foreign branches.
EBA guidelines lay down the conditions that shall be met by legislative and non-legislative moratoria granted in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, to be able to benefit from the preferential treatment outlined in the said guidelines—that is, the forbearance classification will not be triggered. In this respect, MFSA would like to clarify that:
- Any legislative moratoria that have been granted and the conditions which are in line with the provisions of CBM Directive No. 18 on moratoria on credit facilities in exceptional circumstances and the EBA guidelines shall benefit from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any non-legislative moratoria that have been granted and which conditions are in line with the EBA guidelines shall benefit from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any legislative and non-legislative moratoria that have been granted in other jurisdictions, including non-EU countries, and which conditions are in line with the EBA guidelines shall benefit from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any moratoria arising from the effects of the COVID-19 crisis that have been granted prior to publication of the CMB Directive No. 18 (that is, before April 13, 2020) shall be treated as legislative moratoria thus benefitting from the preferential treatment provided for in the EBA guidelines
- Any other moratoria arising from the effects of the COVID-19 crisis, which have been granted on a voluntary basis and individually by a credit institution after the publication of the CBM Directive No. 18 and which conditions are neither fully in line with the Directive nor with the EBA guidelines, shall not be eligible for preferential treatment in accordance with the EBA guidelines.
In terms of reporting requirements pursuant to the Banking Rule 23 and the EBA guidelines on reporting and disclosure of exposures amid COVID-19 crisis, MFSA clarified that moratoria, which are eligible for preferential treatment, shall be considered as EBA-compliant moratoria. Other granted moratoria that are not eligible for preferential treatment shall be considered as “other COVID-19-related forbearance measures.”
Related Links
- Circular on Treatment and Reporting of Moratoria
- Guidelines for Credit Institutions (XLSX)
- Guidelines for Foreign Branches (XLSX)
- Updates on Supervisory Reporting
Keywords: Europe, Malta, Banking, COVID-19, Loan Moratorium, Loan Repayment, Reporting, CRD IV, Preferential Treatment, EBA, MFSA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Related Articles
EBA Finalizes Templates for One-Off Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
EBA Mulls Inclusion of Environmental & Social Risks to Pillar 1 Rules
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently published a report that recommends enhancements to the Pillar 1 framework, under the prudential rules, to capture environmental and social risks.
BCBS Consults on Disclosure of Crypto-Asset Exposures of Banks
As a follow on from its prudential standard on the treatment of crypto-asset exposures, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) proposed disclosure requirements for crypto-asset exposures of banks.
BCBS and EBA Publish Results of Basel III Monitoring Exercise
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise.
PRA Updates Timeline for Final Basel III Rules, Issues Other Updates
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) recently issued a few regulatory updates for banks, with the updated Basel implementation timelines being the key among them.
US Treasury Sets Out Principles for Net-Zero Financing
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has recently set out the principles for net-zero financing and investment.
EC Launches Survey on G7 Principles on Generative AI
The European Commission (EC) launched a stakeholder survey on the draft International Guiding Principles for organizations developing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
