APRA Publishes FAQ on Measurement of Credit Risk Weighted Assets
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets. The answer specifies the appropriate credit conversion factor to be used in determining the regulatory capital for insurance standby letters of credit. An insurance standby letter of credit is issued by an authorized deposit-taking institution to an insurer whereby the authorized deposit-taking institution "guarantees" payment to the insurer in the event that the reinsurer defaults.
Paragraph 1 of Attachment B to the prudential Standard APS 112 (Capital Adequacy: Standardized Approach to Credit Risk) sets out the credit conversion factors to be applied to different categories of non-market-related off-balance sheet transactions under the standardized approach to credit risk. Paragraph 9 of the prudential practice guide APG 112 provides further guidance on the categorization of non-market-related off-balance sheet transactions. Insurance standby letters of credit fall into the category of "direct credit substitutes" (and, therefore, a 100% credit conversion factor is to be applied under the standardized approach). This is because the primary purpose of the letter of credit is to support the claims paying ability of the reinsurer, which is a monetary or financial obligation.
Under paragraph 27 of Attachment B to the prudential standard APS 113 (Capital Adequacy: Internal Ratings-based Approach to Credit Risk), authorized deposit-taking institutions using the Foundation IRB approach must generally apply the credit conversion factors in Attachment B to APS 112. Furthermore, under paragraph 31 of Attachment B to APS 113, products that are assigned a 100% credit conversion factor under the standardized approach are not eligible to be modeled by authorized deposit-taking institutions using the advanced IRB approach. As a result, APRA expects that all insurance standby letters of credit are to be assigned a credit conversion factor of 100%, irrespective of the approach taken by the issuing authorized deposit-taking institution, to determining regulatory capital requirements.
Related Links
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Regulatory Capital, FAQ, Basel, Credit Risk, APS 112, APS 113, Credit Conversion Factor, APRA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
US Agencies Publish Updates for Call Reports, FFIEC 101, and FR Y-9CRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
