APRA Publishes FAQ on Measurement of Credit Risk Weighted Assets
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets. The answer specifies the appropriate credit conversion factor to be used in determining the regulatory capital for insurance standby letters of credit. An insurance standby letter of credit is issued by an authorized deposit-taking institution to an insurer whereby the authorized deposit-taking institution "guarantees" payment to the insurer in the event that the reinsurer defaults.
Paragraph 1 of Attachment B to the prudential Standard APS 112 (Capital Adequacy: Standardized Approach to Credit Risk) sets out the credit conversion factors to be applied to different categories of non-market-related off-balance sheet transactions under the standardized approach to credit risk. Paragraph 9 of the prudential practice guide APG 112 provides further guidance on the categorization of non-market-related off-balance sheet transactions. Insurance standby letters of credit fall into the category of "direct credit substitutes" (and, therefore, a 100% credit conversion factor is to be applied under the standardized approach). This is because the primary purpose of the letter of credit is to support the claims paying ability of the reinsurer, which is a monetary or financial obligation.
Under paragraph 27 of Attachment B to the prudential standard APS 113 (Capital Adequacy: Internal Ratings-based Approach to Credit Risk), authorized deposit-taking institutions using the Foundation IRB approach must generally apply the credit conversion factors in Attachment B to APS 112. Furthermore, under paragraph 31 of Attachment B to APS 113, products that are assigned a 100% credit conversion factor under the standardized approach are not eligible to be modeled by authorized deposit-taking institutions using the advanced IRB approach. As a result, APRA expects that all insurance standby letters of credit are to be assigned a credit conversion factor of 100%, irrespective of the approach taken by the issuing authorized deposit-taking institution, to determining regulatory capital requirements.
Related Links
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Regulatory Capital, FAQ, Basel, Credit Risk, APS 112, APS 113, Credit Conversion Factor, APRA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
US Agencies Publish Updates for Call Reports, FFIEC 101, and FR Y-9CRelated Articles
BIS Report Notes Existing Gaps in Climate Risk Data at Central Banks
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
EBA Examines Remuneration Data and Use of Large Exposure Exemptions
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report that examines the use of certain exemptions included in the large exposures regime under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
BoE Issues Update on Ongoing Data Transformation Program
The Bank of England (BoE) issued a communication to firms to provide an update on the progress of the joint data transformation program—which is being led by BoE, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the industry—for the financial sector in UK.
EBA Issues Draft Methodology and Templates for 2023 Stress Tests
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the draft methodology, templates, and template guidance for the European Union-wide stress test in 2023.
EBA Issues SREP Guidelines and Standards for Investment Firms
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) jointly published the final guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) for investment firms.
BoE and PRA Publish Regulatory Updates for Financial Sector Entities
The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) proposed expectations, via CP8/22, in respect of changes to the instruments or claims that comprise unvested deferred sums awarded to material risk-takers as part of their variable pay.
EIOPA Issues Taxonomy for Solvency II Reporting, Issues Other Updates
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.7.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
OSFI Updates Address BCAR Reporting, Basel Reforms, and Cyber Risk
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) updated the 2023 Basel Capital Adequacy Reporting (BCAR) manual as well as the 2023 BCAR return.
FSB Report Outlines Progress on Climate Risk Roadmap
In a letter to the G20 Leaders, ahead of the July 2022 meeting, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Chair set out an overview of the key work done by FSB.
SRB Issues Resolvability Assessment and Bail-in Implementation Guide
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published its resolvability assessment and "heat map" for 2021, updated the operational guidance on implementation of bail-in tool, and issued the annual report for 2021.
