RBI issued a statement on strengthening governance arrangements with respect to the risk-based internal audit framework. The statement highlights that while the RBI guidance note on risk-based internal audit lays out the basic approach for risk-based internal audit functions, banks are expected to re-orient their approach, in line with the evolving best practices, as a part of their overall governance and internal control framework. Banks are encouraged to adopt the International Internal Audit standards, like those issued by BCBS and the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). In a separate statement, RBI announced the opening of a Second Cohort under the Regulatory Sandbox with cross-border payments as its theme. The window for submission of applications for the Cohort shall be open from until February 15, 2021.
RBI also decided to select “micro, small, and medium enterprise (MSME) lending” as the theme for the Third Cohort, the details of which shall be announced in due course. In addition, RBI notified that a working group is being set up to study all aspects of digital lending activities in the regulated financial sector as well as by unregulated players so that an appropriate regulatory approach can be put in place. The terms of reference would require the working group to:
- Evaluate digital lending activities and assess the penetration and standards of outsourced digital lending activities in RBI regulated entities
- Identify risks posed by unregulated digital lending to financial stability, regulated entities, and consumers
- Suggest regulatory changes, if any, to promote orderly growth of digital lending
- Recommend measures, if any, for expansion of specific regulatory or statutory perimeter and suggest the role of various regulatory and government agencies
- Recommend measures for robust data governance, data privacy and data security standards for deployment of digital lending services
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, Governance, Internal Audit, Internal Control, Regulatory Sandbox, Cross-Border Payments, Digital Lending, Credit Risk, Regtech, RBI
Previous ArticleECB Analysis Shows Privacy as Biggest Concern in Use of Digital Euro
Next ArticleCMF Consults on Implementation of IFRS 17 in Chile
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.