PRA proposed (in CP2/21) an approach to supervising the UK activities of PRA-authorized banks and designated investment firms that are either headquartered outside the UK or are part of a group based outside the UK. CP2/21 refers to such firms as “international banks.” PRA also proposed expectations for receiving information about risks in the wider group and for co-operation from regulated entities and their supervisors with intention to ensure that firms are meeting threshold conditions. The implementation date for the final policy is proposed to be in the second quarter of 2021 and the feedback period on the consultation ends on April 11, 2021. David Bailey of BoE, in his speech on the PRA approach to supervising international banks, highlighted that the regulator is open to international banks operating in the UK, but they will face the same robust regulation as the other financial service firms in the jurisdiction.
CP2/21 proposed the arrangements that PRA would expect to be in place to be able to effectively supervise international banks. The proposals would result in a new supervisory statement on approach to branch and subsidiary supervision of international banks (Appendix of CP2/21), which will supersede SS1/18 on the approach to branch authorization and supervision of international banks. The proposed expectations on subsidiaries and systemic wholesale branches in the proposed supervisory statement are consistent with the existing supervisory approach of PRA and are intended to provide clarity to firms on what they need to do to meet the PRA threshold conditions. CP2/21 proposed that certain factors would be relevant when considering an international bank’s compliance with threshold conditions, taking into account its membership of a group, its potential impact on UK financial stability, and the degree of integration between operations inside and outside the UK.
The expectations of PRA for the information that it requires to effectively supervise a firm vary according to the way in which such a firm’s affairs are integrated or separated from the rest of the group. Consequently, the proposed supervisory statement describes the expectations of PRA for the appropriate degree of separation and controls around the firm’s governance and independent risk management in different circumstances. Although the proposed supervisory statement largely consolidates the existing approach to international banks, PRA recognizes that firms operating with deemed authorizations under the temporary permissions regime may need additional time to adjust. Accordingly, it is proposed that such firms will not need to meet the expectations in the proposed supervisory statement immediately, but will need to do so as soon as practicable and in any event by the time they are authorized by PRA and exit the temporary permissions regime. As part of pre-authorization discussions, PRA proposed that such firms demonstrate how they intend to meet these expectations.
These proposals aim to provide clarity to international banks on the implications, for them, of the different ways they may choose to structure their operations. The proposals also aim to explain how PRA would assess such firms against its threshold conditions, particularly the condition related to the effective supervision of firms when a firm belongs to a group based outside the UK. Overall, the approach of PRA to the supervision of international banks remains stable and consistent following the withdrawal of UK from EU. The proposals have been designed in the context of the UK having left EU and the transition period having come to an end. Unless otherwise stated, any references to EU or EU-derived legislation refer to the version of that legislation which forms part of retained EU law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework.
Comment Due Date: April 11, 2021
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, CP2/21, Governance, Proportionality, Systemic Risk, Threshold Conditions, Foreign Banks, PRA
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleOSFI Consults on Addressing Climate Risks in Financial Sector
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.