PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation. The proposed changes clarify expectations about the eligibility of financial collateral as funded credit protection under Part Three, Title II, Chapter 4 (Credit risk mitigation) of the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013). This consultation closes on April 10, 2019.
The criteria for recognizing collateral as eligible for credit risk mitigation (CRM) purposes are set out in CRR Part Three, Title II, Chapter 4 (Credit risk mitigation). Where the collateral is financial collateral, these criteria include that "the credit quality of the obligor and the value of the collateral shall not have a material positive correlation" (CRR Article 207(2)). In relation to non-recourse loans, in some cases a significant fall in the value of the financial collateral can bring about the default of the obligor. As such, the creditworthiness of the obligor can depend materially on the value of the financial collateral. The risk mitigation provided by such collateral may be compromised and Article 207(2) is relevant. In view of PRA, CRR is clear on this point. However, PRA has identified some variability in how firms interpret and apply the Article 207(2) requirement. PRA considers it necessary to clarify both how Article 207(2) applies in such circumstances and PRA’s expectations of how firms should treat collateral with a material positive correlation for credit risk mitigation purposes.
The consultation proposes adding a new chapter to SS17/13, set out in the Appendix. CP1/19 is relevant to UK banks, building societies, and PRA-designated UK investment firms that are subject to CRR. In February 2018, CP6/18 titled "Credit risk mitigation: Eligibility of guarantees as unfunded credit protection" had proposed adding a Chapter 7 to SS17/13; therefore, CP1/19 proposes to add Chapter 8, subject to the outcome of CP6/18.
Comment Due Date: April 10, 2018
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Credit Risk Mitigation, Credit Risk, CRR, CP1/19, SS17/13, PRA
Previous ArticleBCL Publishes Dates for Monthly and Quarterly AnaCredit Reporting
Next ArticleFASB Issues Q&A on Estimating Credit Loss Reserves
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.