ESRB published a report on mitigating the procyclicality of margins and haircuts in derivatives markets and securities financing transactions. The report provides new analysis and sets out possible policy options to address systemic risks arising from the procyclicality associated with margin and haircut practices. ESRB is mindful that the implementation of these policy options would require further work and engagement with market participants and international fora. This report expands on the work of the 2017 report on the macro-prudential use of margins and haircuts.
ESRB is now placing greater emphasis on policy options aimed at reducing liquidity strains during times of market stress than on those that constrain the build-up of leverage during boom. The policy options in consideration are as follows:
- Pass-through, by central counterparties, of any intraday variation margin collected in the course of the same day
- Introduction of initial margin floors in both centrally and non-centrally cleared derivatives markets
- Reduction of risks of procyclicality in client clearing by limiting the discretion of client clearing service providers toward their clients
- Introduction of adequate notice periods to changes in collateral haircuts and eligibility
- Introduction of a cash collateral buffer for market participants active in centrally and non-centrally cleared derivatives markets
- Mandatory use of initial and variation margins as risk mitigation techniques in non-centrally cleared securities financing transaction markets
ESRB intends to perform further work to analyze the functioning and impact of these policy options. This could include an assessment of the policy options (potentially using new data sources), analysis of any side effects they may have, and a further assessment of interaction between the options and the existing regulations. Four of the options identified—the mandatory pass-through of intraday variation margin, initial margin floors, the strengthening of client clearing, and guidance on notice periods—would require changes to the regulatory framework for centrally cleared and non-centrally cleared derivatives. By contrast, introducing cash collateral buffers for entities engaging in derivatives transactions would require changes to the prudential rules that apply to banks, insurers, and other financial entities. The policy option on bilateral securities financing transactions, which is an extension of the globally agreed safeguards applied to derivatives transactions, would require the development of a new regulatory framework. In identifying these options, ESRB is mindful that further work and engagement with regulatory standard-setters and industry representatives is needed.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Procyclicality, Derivatives, Securities Financing Transactions, Systemic Risk, CCPs, Initial Margin, Variation Margin, Haircuts, ESRB
Previous ArticleESMA Publishes Its Strategic Orientation for 2020-22
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.