January 09, 2019

While speaking at the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) Executive Roundtable in Florida, Randal K. Quarles of FED provided some updates on the forthcoming proposal on insurance holding company capital requirements, often referred to as the Building Block Approach. He also discussed the importance of insurance sector to the economy and the role of FED in the consolidated supervision of insurance firms.

After stating that Dodd-Frank Act gave FED regulatory responsibilities for insurance holding companies that choose to own a federally insured depository institution and those designated by FSOC, Mr. Quarles moved on to discuss the advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) on insurance capital requirements, which FED had issued in June 2016. The ANPR had set out two frameworks for capital standards that are each unlike the capital rules for bank holding companies: a "consolidated approach" applicable to systemically important insurance companies and a "Building Block Approach" to be applied to savings and loan holding companies or bank holding companies with significant insurance activities. The Building Block Approach, as set out in the ANPR, was fashioned as a framework that builds on the regulatory capital rules of subsidiaries' functional regulators—state or foreign insurance regulators for insurance subsidiaries and federal banking regulators for insured depository institutions—to provide a consolidated capital requirement. He mentioned that FED appreciates the comments received, including from the ACLI and other interested parties, and has worked hard to reflect the perspectives of commenters in developing the framework. FED expects to publish a formal proposal in the "not-too-distant future."

He then explained that, for various reasons, in designing the Building Block Approach, FED had decided against applying the bank holding company capital rules to supervised insurance firms, the "capital approach akin to the European Solvency II framework," and the Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) by IAIS. He added that for any form of an ICS to be implementable globally, it needs to be suitable for the U.S. insurance market. The current core proposal in the ICS would face implementation challenges in the United States. For instance, such a framework may fail to adequately account for the U.S. accounting frameworks, both Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the NAIC's Statutory Accounting Principles, can introduce excessive volatility, and may involve excessive reliance on the internal models of supervised firms. This motivates FED's advocacy of an aggregation alternative and the use of an alternative valuation method that derives from U.S. GAAP in the ICS. 

The proposed Building Block Approach is an approach to a consolidated capital requirement that considers all material risks in the enterprise by aggregating the capital positions of companies under an insurance holding company, after making some adjustments and scaling them to a common capital regime. These building blocks are then used to calculate combined, enterprise-level capital resources and requirements. In each building block, the Building Block Approach generally applies the capital regime for that block to the subsidiaries in that block. For instance, in a life insurance building block, subsidiaries within this block would be treated in the Building Block Approach the way they would be treated under life insurance capital requirements. The Building Block Approach would apply insurance capital rules consistently, without regard to permitted accounting practices granted by an individual state, thus uniformly applying statutory accounting principles as set forth by NAIC. Measures to avoid double-counting, including double-leverage, that could arise from intercompany transactions would be built into the approach's aggregation process.

Other areas where adjustments would be made include provisions to comply with the Collins Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act—for instance, allowing only instruments meeting the criteria under the FED's bank capital rules to qualify as capital for an insurance holding company—and technical adjustments. Two building blocks under two different capital regimes cannot simply be added together if, as is frequently the case, each regime has a different scale for its ratios and thresholds. The Building Block Approach proposes to scale and equate capital positions in different regimes through analyzing historical defaults under those regimes. In conclusion, Mr. Quarles reinforced that FED remains committed to discharging its domestic authority responsibly in a way that recognizes the unique business of insurance companies. Additionally, FED will continue to advocate for international insurance standards that promote a global level playing field and work well for the U.S. insurance market. 

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Americas, US, Insurance, Accounting, Building Block Approach, Capital Requirements, Dodd Frank Act, US GAAP, FED

Related Articles
News

IMF Releases Report on 2019 Article IV Consultation with United States

IMF published its staff report in the context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with the United States.

June 24, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BIS Report Discusses Regulatory Issues Related to Big Techs in Finance

BIS has pre-released a chapter of the BIS Annual Economic Report; this chapter focuses on the risks and opportunities presented by large technology firms in the financial services sector.

June 23, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IOSCO Report Examines Liquidity in Corporate Bond Markets

IOSCO published a report that examines the factors affecting liquidity, under stressed conditions, in the secondary corporate bond markets.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Publishes Results of the 2019 Stress Tests for Banks

FED published a report presenting results of the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) exercise for 2019.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Report Examines Global Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Practices

BCBS published a report that examines the Pillar 2 supervisory review practices and approaches in Basel member jurisdictions.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IASB Publishes Work Plan and Meeting Updates for June 2019

IASB published an updated work plan and a summary of its June meeting, which presents preliminary decisions of the Board.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Publishes Banking Exposure Limits Code Under Banking Ordinance

HKMA issued a circular to all authorized institutions informing that the Banking (Exposure Limits) Code has been published in the Gazette on June 21, 2019.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Proposes Guideline on Internal Model Oversight for Insurers

OSFI proposed the draft guideline E-25 on the internal model oversight framework for federally regulated property and casualty (P&C) insurance companies.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for June 2019

Under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week, EBA published one answer regarding the calculation of institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer rates.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SEC Finalizes Capital and Margin Requirements for Security-Based Swaps

SEC adopted a package of rules and rule amendments to establish capital, margin, and segregation requirements for security-based swaps, under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

June 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3304