EC Platform Publishes Final Report on Social Taxonomy
The European Commission's Platform on Sustainable Finance published the final report on social taxonomy. The report presents a proposed structure for a social taxonomy within the present European Union legislative environment on sustainable finance and governance. This environment currently consists of the existing legislation and the proposed initiatives on the European Union taxonomy, the proposed Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive or CSRD, the Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation or SFDR, and the sustainable corporate-governance initiative.
The suggested structure of the social taxonomy employs certain structural aspects of the environmental taxonomy—namely, development of social objectives, types of substantial contributions, “do no significant harm” criteria, and minimum safeguards. Apart from the structural elements of a social taxonomy, the report suggests ways to ensure a balance in the relationship between an environmental taxonomy and a social taxonomy. One suggestion is that just as social and governance-related minimum safeguards are part of the environmental taxonomy, minimum environmental safeguards should be part of the future social taxonomy. The other suggestion is to integrate the social and environmental taxonomy more closely, with the environmental and social “do no significant harm” criteria being valid for both the social and the environmental activities. Finally, the report presents some requirements for future social criteria, and indicators within this framework, alongside ideas about the next steps for developing a social taxonomy. The next steps for developing a social taxonomy would be to
- Clarify the minimum safeguards according to the scoping note
- Conduct a study on the impact of a social taxonomy, considering different options for application and designs
- Work out a rationale for prioritizing objectives and sub-objectives
- Prioritize objectives according to the rationale
- Define the "substantial-contribution" and “do no significant harm” criteria for the first objective(s) and sectors
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Sustainable Finance, Social Taxonomy, Platform on Sustainable Finance, CSRD, NFRD, SFDR, EC, Subheadline
Featured Experts
Hasan Cerhozi
Hasan leads Moody’s Analytics ESG methodology development. He is expert on carbon transition, nature related risks and is a guest lecturer at ESSEC Business school on sustainable finance.
James Partridge
Credit analytics expert helping clients understand, develop, and implement credit models for origination, monitoring, and regulatory reporting.
Previous Article
ECB Issues Multiple Regulatory Updates in February 2022Related Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.