The European Commission's Platform on Sustainable Finance published the final report on social taxonomy. The report presents a proposed structure for a social taxonomy within the present European Union legislative environment on sustainable finance and governance. This environment currently consists of the existing legislation and the proposed initiatives on the European Union taxonomy, the proposed Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive or CSRD, the Sustainable Finance Disclosures Regulation or SFDR, and the sustainable corporate-governance initiative.
The suggested structure of the social taxonomy employs certain structural aspects of the environmental taxonomy—namely, development of social objectives, types of substantial contributions, “do no significant harm” criteria, and minimum safeguards. Apart from the structural elements of a social taxonomy, the report suggests ways to ensure a balance in the relationship between an environmental taxonomy and a social taxonomy. One suggestion is that just as social and governance-related minimum safeguards are part of the environmental taxonomy, minimum environmental safeguards should be part of the future social taxonomy. The other suggestion is to integrate the social and environmental taxonomy more closely, with the environmental and social “do no significant harm” criteria being valid for both the social and the environmental activities. Finally, the report presents some requirements for future social criteria, and indicators within this framework, alongside ideas about the next steps for developing a social taxonomy. The next steps for developing a social taxonomy would be to
- Clarify the minimum safeguards according to the scoping note
- Conduct a study on the impact of a social taxonomy, considering different options for application and designs
- Work out a rationale for prioritizing objectives and sub-objectives
- Prioritize objectives according to the rationale
- Define the "substantial-contribution" and “do no significant harm” criteria for the first objective(s) and sectors
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, ESG, Sustainable Finance, Social Taxonomy, Platform on Sustainable Finance, CSRD, NFRD, SFDR, EC, Subheadline
Previous ArticleECB Issues Multiple Regulatory Updates in February 2022
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)