PRA is proposing to update the Pillar 2A capital framework to take account of the additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffer requirements in a standard risk environment. In this context, a key aspect of the proposal is to reduce variable Pillar 2A capital requirements. PRA proposes to apply the Pillar 2A reduction, where applicable, at the same time or before the 2% countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) rate in UK comes into effect on December 16, 2020. This consultation closes on April 30, 2020. The proposed implementation date of the policy in the consultation paper is July 06, 2020.
The proposals in this consultation only relate to the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) decision of December 16, 2019, to raise the level of the UK CCyB rate that it expects to set in a standard risk environment from in the region of 1% to in the region of 2%. Any subsequent changes in the UK CCyB rate brought about by changes in the FPC's view of the prevailing risk environment would not be reflected in the changes in Pillar 2A. The proposals in this consultation paper would make amendments to supervisory statement (SS31/15) on the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). The proposals clarify the considerations related to macro-prudential buffers that PRA takes into account when it carries out an overall assessment of the level of capital that would be sufficient to ensure the sound management and coverage of the risks of firms.
This consultation is part of a package that includes review of the structural level and balance of capital requirements for the UK banking system undertaken by FPC; this includes the subsequent increase in the UK CCyB rate that FPC expects to set in a standard risk environment and the clarification of BoE that, in resolution, it expects all debt that is bailed in to be written down or converted to common equity tier 1 (CET1). The purpose of this package is to:
- Increase resilience—While leaving the overall loss-absorbing capacity for the banking system broadly unaffected, the changes would shift the balance of that capacity toward higher quality tier 1 capital.
- Improve responsiveness of capital requirements to economic conditions—By shifting the balance of capital requirements from minimum requirements that should be maintained at all times toward buffers that can be drawn down as needed, these changes would mean that banks would be more able to absorb losses while maintaining lending to the real economy through the cycle.
- Enhance resolvability—The intention of BoE, in resolution, to write down or convert debt to CET1 capital would make resolved banks more resilient to further losses, supporting their resolution and minimizing the wider economic costs of their failure.
The consultation paper is relevant to the PRA-authorized UK banks, building societies, and designated investment firms. The proposals have been designed in the context of the withdrawal of UK from EU and entry into the transition period, during which time the UK remains subject to European law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework at the end of the transition period, including those arising once any new arrangements with EU take effect. PRA has assessed that the proposals would not need to be amended under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Comment Due Date: April 30, 2020
Effective Date: July 06, 2020
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, CCyB, Pillar 2A, ICAAP, SREP, CET1, Capital Framework, FPC, Macro-prudential Policy, Resolution Framework, BoE, PRA
Previous ArticlePRA Letter to Insurers With Outstanding EU Liabilities Post Brexit
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.