PRA published a report on its response to the inquiry of the Treasury Committee into Solvency II. PRA agrees with the Treasury Committee on the importance of fostering and maintaining a strong, effective, and open dialog between the regulator and the industry. In October 2017, the Treasury Committee issued a report titled “The Solvency II Directive and its Impact on the UK Insurance Industry.” In January 2018, Sam Woods, Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation, set out his initial thoughts on the recommendations of the report. As requested by the Treasury Committee, PRA is providing further details on the areas discussed.
The report is split into four parts. Part 1 gives an overview of the UK insurance industry and sets out the rationale for the prudential regulation of insurers. Part 2 discusses the design of Solvency II, how it differs from the previous prudential regime for insurers in the UK, and the impact Solvency II has had on insurers since it came into force. Part 3 discusses the recommendation of the Treasury Committee in respect of the secondary competition objective, along with the points raised by the Treasury Committee about the engagement of PRA with industry and its skills and experience in insurance. Part 4 includes response to the policy recommendations made in the report of the Treasury Committee, along with an update on the further developments on other policy issues raised by the Association of British Insurers during the Treasury Committee’s inquiry.
PRA has limited scope to change Solvency II due to its detailed, rules-based nature. However, PRA is committed to making improvements to the implementation of Solvency II, where appropriate and where it has discretion to do so. There is a lot of common ground between the Treasury Committee, the industry, and PRA about aspects of Solvency II that do not work well. In this paper, PRA considered the Treasury Committee recommendations on specific policy issues and set out its responses, along with the actions taken to address the points raised.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Solvency II, Response to Recommendations, PRA
RBNZ published the financial stability report for May 2020. This review of the financial system in the country highlights that the economic disruption associated with COVID-19 will present challenges to the financial system.
Financial policymakers and international standard-setters met virtually with private-sector executives to discuss international policy responses to COVID-19 pandemic.
HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA published thematic note presenting a preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the banking sector in EU.
HKMA published a circular, addressed to authorized institutions, on the application of the Basel Committee guidance on certain COVID-related measures.
PRA provided further information on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address the challenges arising from COVID-19 outbreak.
PRA published final policy (in PS13/20) setting out the approach and expectations for authorization and supervision of insurance special purpose vehicles (ISPVs or insurance SPVs).
BoE published version 2.0.1 of the Capital+ XBRL Utility, along with the related release notes.
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.